Personal Statements from Previous Applicants
Through their personal statements, applicants share their greatest influences, professional aspirations, and the reasons why they chose BU Law. We share these examples to help you consider how to approach your own personal statement as you prepare your application.
Passionate students from across the globe choose BU Law for many different reasons. The personal statement portion of our application allows them opportunity to discuss significant experiences that have inspired them to become lawyers. Learn why these students—through influences like a chemical plant emergency, first police encounter, and jazz music—chose to apply to BU Law.
Kelvin: A student stands at a crossroads and chooses a path to pursue
Scanning over the offer letter in front of me, I slowly began to appreciate how Caesar must have felt standing before the Rubicon. All the weeks at work, all the months of anxious preparation had led to this moment. This decision. Below the hearty congratulations and hefty compensation plan, the choice: accept the terms of employment within the week or see the offer expire. To my family and friends, the decision was a no-brainer. My mom would beam with pride as I told her about the all-inclusive paid internship and potential full-time salary. My friends would react with shock, unsure how I managed to land a summer at a prestigious San Francisco bank. They would tell me I had secured it all, but I didn’t feel secure at all. Standing at the crossroads of past, present, and future, I felt unsure which path to take.
I considered my past. My parents were born into chaos of the Cultural Revolution. They grew up looking toward distant shores, in search of personal security and economic opportunity. In their pursuit, they came to America. And so, to America I was born, the son of two countries, two cultures. Like the children of many immigrants, I was compelled to prioritize subjects viewed as financially stable and pursue a career in a technical profession. In college, it was finance that caught my eye. Finance sought to optimize the outcomes of any given situation by calculating the present value of every possible decision. Equipped with those skills, I dreamed of finding the solutions that would materially improve the lives of people the world over. It was that dream which landed me at door of investment banking. At twenty-one, I was helping corporate executives and seasoned bankers complete the tortuous process of closing nine-figure transactions. My efforts influenced the decisions that had helped fulfill the pensions of over 330,000 Canadian school teachers. I had finally contributed to the world, or at least the world of finance. In investment banking, I could craft the responses to real world problems and real-world needs, and yet.
I stared at the screen before me, overcome by vertigo. Across from me wasn’t Rome, but the ivory tower of investment banking. To even have this choice, I knew I was among the truly fortunate few. But all that crossed my mind were those few instances in my life I felt torn between passion and purpose. In my adolescence, anxiety had been my constant companion. In history’s embrace, however, I felt safe. In history’s embrace, I fell in love. In high school debate, I discovered history could also be used to write history. Combing through endless streams of facts and figures, I pictured not only the past and present as they were, but also the future as it could and should be. My arguments employed legal frameworks from the past to justify normative conclusions about the present that would have consequential implications for the future. Through this lens, I had learned to see the world. Debate had taught me how to think, but it would also teach me how to feel. Arguing for the United States to guarantee the right to housing had been one of the most fulfilling moments of my entire life. Standing on stage, I wasn’t thinking about the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. No, it was the poverty-stricken families I grew up with in China. No, it was the kids in the homeless camp I drove past every day on my way to school. No, in fact I wasn’t thinking at all. Animated only by the flames of passion, I spoke. But my fire didn’t bum for long. To my parents, studying history in college was as sure a way to starve as any. Having lived my life benefiting from their sacrifices, I listened. My first love was not meant to be.
I thought back to my experiences in college. The classes I enjoyed most didn’t limit their focus to just finance, but explored how the interaction between disciplines affected the world at large. Analyzing the impact of different policies on economic output and social welfare, I came to admire law’s unique ability to recruit all aspects of society to in turn solve problems on a whole-of-society scale. Yet as I sat there, gazing into the emboldened name of a once-great financier, I realized I felt nothing. In that moment I understood what it was I truly desired. The COVID-19 pandemic had taught me that the consequences of calamity are borne by far more than business alone. Although banking would allow me to support the essential needs of companies, banking could not provide me the opportunity to solve problems beyond its sphere. I did want to solve the problems of business, but I also wanted my solutions to benefit society as a whole. I didn’t want to sit secluded atop the ivory tower unaware of the problems below. I wanted to stand tall and use my thoughts, my actions, and all my efforts to lift the ground beneath all feet.
History had been the passion of my past, finance the priority of my present. The promise of my future rested solely on the decision that lay before me. I had once dreamed of using finance to cure the world’s ills. I had once dreamed of being an investment banker. My once dreams, however, would not come to fruition. But in me there still burned the desire for passion, for purpose. I closed my computer. Standing at the shore of Rubicon River, I knew which path I wanted to take. The die would not be cast.
Every process engineer remembers their first plant emergency. Mine happened less than a month after I started my first chemical engineering job. It was mid-afternoon on Labor Day, and I was confused when I saw that my boss was calling me. A power blip had caused an upset at the plant, and he asked me if I wanted to come in and help. I said yes. The parking lot was nearly full when I got to the plant – something I’d come to recognize over the years as the first sign of something gone wrong. Once I was inside the control room, I felt uncertain and anxious. Actions and decisions were being made all around me, and I was at a complete loss on what I could do to help. After standing a while staring at the alarms on the bright process screens, I finally did the only thing I felt qualified to do at that point: ask questions. What does each of these alarms mean? How does an operator go about prioritizing action when there are hundreds to address? I came to find that alarm “floods” are common in emergencies, as most alarms are designed to function under normal operation, and aren’t programmed to account for abnormal situations. When asked what I do for a living, I say that I help prevent things from exploding. I like to think that this conjures up an image of me single-handedly holding back a fiery explosion with just my bare hands, but it’s less dramatic than that. Process safety is mostly prophylactic – it involves building layers of protection to prevent disastrous chains of events from occurring. Once a spill, fire, or explosion occurs, people and the environment are already at risk of irreversible injuries and damages. However, it’s not the rules themselves that keep the plant running safely. It’s our ability to understand and carry out the rules, both during emergencies and during everyday operation. Although years of engineering education gave me the vocabulary, equations, and critical thinking skills to handle the theoretical, I quickly realized that my classes didn’t prepare me for the realities of running a chemical plant. My first couple years as a process safety engineer were a crash course in the technology of the plant. Starting with that first plant emergency, I learned that to do my job well, I needed to understand everything I could about the process: not just the “hows,” but the “whys.” Why do hundreds of alarms come on when we lose power, and how can we make it easier to respond to this emergency? At first, I struggled to find the courage to ask for help. I felt like I should’ve known more than I did, and that asking others would alert them to my ignorance. However, with each question I gained confidence and over time, I developed relationships with the operators that were built on trust and respect. After my experience with that first plant emergency on Labor Day, I made it my goal to identify the most frequent alarms and rationalize their purpose. I enjoy digging into regulatory language and plant documentation to deduce justifications for these alarms. Guided by my research and interpretation, I have since made hundreds of changes to our programming that improve an operator’s ability to respond to process events. I pride myself on learning how to balance between safety, compliance, and pragmatism, which are often at odds with each other. When safety regulations are vague, I research the letters of guidance and communications from regulatory bodies and how the industry at large complies. When research fails to provide a clear path forward I must use my judgment to find the proper balance. I now find confidence in admitting that there’s still a lot I don’t know. I learned that in a sea of uncertainty, I enjoy the process of finding solid understanding with every question. This lesson is what led me to decide to pursue law. In my current job, I am excited when a regulatory question is posed and it’s my responsibility to navigate the abundance of resources to determine the next course of action. At Boston University I want to explore this space – where the abstract word of law intersects with the reality of interpreting and acting upon it. Penny: Regulatory law sparks curiosity in a process engineer
I had my first interaction with the police when I was five. My mother was driving me to school and was suddenly stopped by an officer who screamed at her at an ear-splitting volume. While his words escape me, I will never forget the fear. There I was, watching a large man verbally assault my mother with no regard for the shaking child in the backseat. After a few tense moments, he let us go. While our morning car rides were characterized by spirited conversation, this one was consumed by heavy silence; his shouts echoed in our minds. When we reached the school, I asked my mother why the officer unreasonably pulled her over. With tired eyes worn from existing as an Indian woman in America, she said “Because to them, monu, we are thugs, not people.” I learned a hard truth that many children of color inevitably confront- our country’s modes of “justice” are biased against those marked with melanin. Over a decade later, George Floyd was murdered. As police reform dominated political discourse, I thought back to my mother’s ordeal with the officer. In the 12 years between her assailment and Floyd’s asphyxiation, it seemed like no progress had been made. While the justice system was meant to protect the public from harm, it was often an arbiter of said harm to marginalized communities. I realized that if people in power are unwilling to make the changes necessary to combat state violence, we must catalyze those changes ourselves. I utilized my college education to academically engage my interest in the justice apparatus. Through courses that examined this system from sociological, psychological, and environmental lenses, I learned how deep-rooted this institution is in our society. From our self-perceptions to the air we breathe, police and prisons impact our daily lives in innumerable ways. My studies immersed me in criminological literature that challenged the ubiquity of this system. Upon entering a dreamscape in which a decarceral future was possible, I was determined to play a role in its creation. Armed with my newfound perspective and analytical prowess, I organized. As I began working on political campaigns, my determination only grew stronger. Hearing constituents’ stories, gauging their needs, and empowering them to address those needs through civic engagement exemplified the collaborative nature of progress. Change comes from communal effort spearheaded by impassioned masses, not individual action. Throughout my journey, one question loomed in my mind: What can I do to uplift more disadvantaged people and facilitate advancements within the justice system? Whether guaranteeing indigent clients’ right to counsel via public defense or leading movements for police divestment through impact litigation, legal professionals are proven agents of criminal law reform. This education, and the institutional knowledge it provides, positions legal professionals to be particularly adept at creating the policy transformations I desire to make. Law school will engage my abolitionist mindset through intellectually stimulating coursework, pro bono projects, and clinics where I can gain practical experience with justice- impacted populations. More importantly, I will join a brilliant cohort of future public interest leaders whom I will have the honor of learning with and from. As part of a collective emboldened by the legal expertise we will gain, the strong professional network we will access, and the robust academic support system we will employ, law school is a place where I will simultaneously learn how to unlock the law’s emancipatory potential and thrive as a scholar. Before I adopted the liberationist outlook guiding me through my activist endeavors, memories of my first police encounter evoked the same debilitating fear I felt when I was five. I now look upon that moment with what I can only describe as revolutionary hope-a hope that we can one day rebuild society on the tenets of compassion rather than punishment. Trained by elite legal scholars and shepherded by my inner fire, I can and will actualize that hope into a new world where justice means restoration instead of retribution. Josh: Revolutionary hope in fighting for restorative justice
One November evening, after waving goodbye to my online lecture and watching the last rays of sunlight disappear, I turned to see my bass guitar lying flat on the floor, hibernating. For several years, I had retired from my jazz career to focus on academics. Piles of notes on the principles of international trade, Chinese grammar structures, and the Song dynasty’s unprecedented population increase sat in front of me, but the moment I confronted my former instrument, I was no longer at my desk; I felt like I was on stage again. My fingers glided across the ebony fretboard, striking each staccato and bouncing across each phrase, forging the iconic melody of Chick Corea’s “Armando’s Rhumba.” I locked eyes with the pianist, each of us supporting the other through our sounds and taking joy in the music we created together. As the moment faded, I returned to my dimly lit room, silent and alone. Later that night I signed up to audition for Georgetown’s jazz program and initiated a months-long practice regimen to prepare for auditions. While I often fought the feeling of awkwardness as I relearned old scales and arpeggios, my memories of joy onstage with my peers kept me motivated. Months later, my determination earned me a place in the jazz combos program, which organized musicians into small groups and encouraged an open-ended method of studying jazz. “I hope you’re not too used to your music being written out for you,” our professor said to me during the semester’s first rehearsal, as he handed out blank chord sheets. This new format of sheet music demanded that I create an original rhythm and improvise note selection. While I relished the opportunity to exercise more creative freedom, it became clear after several weeks that I had yet to learn the most important lesson about jazz. My bandmates and I were rehearsing the solo section from Billie Holiday’s “God Bless the Child” when our professor waved for us to stop playing. I was hoping to receive praise for the solo I had been refining in my bedroom, but I could tell from his indifferent expression that this would not be the case. “I don’t believe it yet. Those blank chord sheets have you playing with freedom, but only as individuals. Nobody is complementing each other,” he explained. Sensing our collective frustration, he devised an exercise that would help us build collaborative chemistry. “I want you to close your eyes. Listen and feel, then play.” Although apprehensive at first, the percussionist and I settled into a steady groove before cuing the pianist’s solo. I was liberated. Casting aside the blank chord sheets, I could rely instead on my senses to guide my creativity, which in this setting encouraged me to connect with the music of my peers. I sensed myself focusing on the percussionist’s rhythm. I experimented with my sound, matching my rhythm with that of the percussionist’s high-hat. Our pianist’s heavy-handed technique allowed me to project my own music, exploring the lower register of my instrument to create punchy, complex bass lines. The words “listen and feel” echoed in my mind as we transitioned into the flute solo. I guided my hand further down the neck of the bass, playing in a higher octave, quieter volume and with simpler rhythms in order to better support the delicate melody of our flutist. Clamping my eyes shut, I felt transported back to my high school stage, and I grinned. Eventually, we faded out and opened our eyes to see that everyone, including our professor, had donned the same smile. The next few weeks of rehearsal were especially exciting. Like scientists in a lab, my bandmates and I explored the range of sonic profiles we could create by fine tuning the dynamics, rhythms, etc. of each musician. These exercises became crucial in understanding our roles as members of a group. In the classroom, I carved out my own role as a supportive presence in my thesis seminar. Treating the process like a collaborative effort rather than an individual competition, I opened myself to constructive feedback from my peers and advisors, offered my own insights, and even organized social events to tackle our shared burnout. By the time my bandmates and I stepped onstage for our end-of-semester concert, the spirit of collaboration had become a foundational force in my personal development. Rediscovering my joy for jazz has reminded me not only how important it is to color one’s life with creativity, but also that embracing comradery allows me and my peers to create far beyond our own capabilities. As I look forward to my career in law, I will continue to venerate the power of collaboration and put faith in my peers to support me across my academic and professional pursuits. I will allow my eyes to drift away from the chord sheets in front of me, and pay attention to the talent and ability of those around me. As future lawyers, we are more capable as a bonded community than as a loose network of individuals. I will aim my attention away from what I might accomplish on my own and instead dream of what we might create in concert with each other. Ethan: A jazz musician pursues law in concert with community