Comments & Discussion

Boston University moderates comments to facilitate an informed, substantive, civil conversation. Abusive, profane, self-promotional, misleading, incoherent or off-topic comments will be rejected. Moderators are staffed during regular business hours (EST) and can only accept comments written in English. Statistics or facts must include a citation or a link to the citation.

There are 5 comments on Too Many Dead: The Need To Reframe Gun Violence as a Public Health Issue

  1. According to CDC data, most deaths that are due to injury by firearms are from suicides. Far more people die in car accidents and alcohol-induced deaths. But of course even more people die from heart disease, cancer, diabetes and pneumonia.

    Hey Columbia, where’s your cry for bringing back Prohibition since you’re so concerned about people dying?

    Also, is alcohol served at any university sporting events? If so, then remember, you’re killing kids.

  2. Gun violence is not a disease. it is an act of man. an overwhelming number of African Americans are killed/shot by other African Americans. How is that a disease? Adults leaving guns laying around for children to pick up, how is that a disease? someone decides to off themselves with a gun instead of overdose, how is that a disease? No, it is education that may be needed. Teach children to respect a life – whether it is an animal or human – respect life. Community leaders need to hammer down on the gangs and not sit and moan about the police not doing anything. they are your children and neighbors in the gangs, step up and do something.

  3. The National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, part of the CDC, funds research on many categories of injuries and accidental deaths, to include those related to car accidents, alcohol and prescription drugs, child abuse, household mishaps and others.

    However, it is disallowed by Congress to fund research on deaths and injuries related to firearms, simply because there is a relatively small but highly politically active group of people in the United States who are deeply offended at the suggestion that there is any form of a causal relationship between the presence or availability of highly efficient killing tools and the deaths and injuries caused by their use or misuse.

    In the U.S., there are tens of thousands of deaths involving guns every year, but apparently, it is a highly inflammatory thing to even suggest through the opening of a particular line of scientific inquiry that there is a possible connection between guns and the injuries and deaths that they are involved in.

    It seems that we are both idiots and communists if we even suggest that there is a connection between having a gun and shooting someone with it and not having a gun and not shooting someone.

  4. The signatories of this nonsense are, as expected, representatives from the most anti-2nd amendment states in the US. their opinions should not be held relevant to nor have an effect on the rest of the country. the reason the pro-2nd amendment proponents refuse to allow the pinkos to conduct tax-payer funded research into the issue is because the results of the research will be skewed to comply with the anti-2nd amendment agenda of the backers of this travesty, just as they have repeatedly done in the past. the bias against gun owners by the CDC has been clearly and repeatedly demonstrated.

    those who are so desperately attempting to deprive americans of their 2nd amendment rights have repeatedly shown their willingness to engage in deception and deceit to flat out lie about the state of firearms in the US. considering the actual low number of deaths due to firearms, especially in comparison to other means of preventable deaths, i want to know why the gun control advocates are so desperate to take away law abiding citizens guns.

    i certainly have no regard for anyone related to the medical community when it comes to the 2nd amendment issue considering they are the ones responsible for approximately 300 thousand to 400 thousand preventable deaths per year when firearms are on the order of about 10 thousand…yet they have the audacity to claim to be relevant in commenting on the situation

Post a comment.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *