
Bostonia is published in print three times a year and updated weekly on the web.
In 2002, Boston attorney
Mitchell Garabedian represented 86 people who claimed to have been molested or raped as children by Father John J. Geoghan, a Catholic priest from Dorchester, Mass. The case led to a $10 million settlement for Garabedian’s clients, and to a Boston Globe Spotlight team investigation that exposed an international epidemic of abuse and cover-up extending all the way to the Vatican. Garabedian has since represented more than 1,000 victims in 14 countries, and he still gets more than 20 calls a month from alleged victims seeking his help.
The Globe investigation was rewarded with a Pulitzer Prize, and became the subject of the 2015 Academy Award–winning film Spotlight. Actor Stanley Tucci portrays Garabedian (CGS’71, CAS’73) in the film with such intensity, the Boston attorney says, that many reporters are now terrified of meeting with him.
People who know him don’t disavow that intensity, but, they say, there are other sides to the sometimes fearsome lawyer who grew up on a farm in Methuen, Mass. He is witty, and he is generous, a trait inherited from his father, whose farmhands often came to him for advice. His family attended an Armenian Apostolic church every Sunday. “It was a very peaceful, kind way to live,” says Garabedian, whose office, piled high with boxes and papers, is just around the corner from Faneuil Hall, where his family once sold vegetables grown on their farm.
Bostonia talked with him, and with people who know him well, about the scandal, his commitment to the victims, and what drove him to take on the Catholic Church.
MITCHELL GARABEDIAN: In 1994, a client came to me for help. She said, “I would like you to speak to my three children, because I can’t figure out what is going on.” One boy was washing his hands every day until they bled. Another boy was taking two-hour showers. And the oldest boy was violent with his younger brothers. This was a fatherless family.
We’d shoot the breeze. I talked to them about what they did during the day, about baseball, school, friends, who visited them. And you could see their attitude, tone, and demeanor change when it came to the priest who visited them. All of a sudden, they would become very nervous. They would clam up.
They lived in the projects in Waltham, and my client had me speak to her girlfriends, her neighbors, and some of her relatives. The priest was Father John J. Geoghan, and before I knew it I had dozens of children who were acting the same way, who had all been visited by Geoghan. He took them for ice cream, then molested them, fondled them in bed.
I’ve got Geoghan abusing children over the course of 36 years—36 years! And it’s not unusual, unfortunately. I’ve got 154 claims against Geoghan. That’s one priest! There have been thousands of others; each priest has probably molested hundreds of children. Hundreds.
GLEN KACHADORIAN (a childhood friend): Mitch always fought against bullies. We’d all pile into his van, and Mitch would drive us around Boston. I recall several times when all of a sudden, he would be out of the van and in somebody’s face when he saw something he didn’t like. He was a wildcat. He was pretty brave, even then.
MICHAEL REZENDES (CAS’78) (Boston Globe Spotlight reporter): When Mitchell began representing victims of clergy sex abuse, he took all these cases on a pro bono basis. That means you don’t get paid unless you win a judgment. They were going up against the Catholic Church, and those are long odds right there. It’s a very powerful institution, and Mitch was basically a solo practitioner. A lot of his clients were pretty damaged, and I think many lawyers would have been reluctant to take them on. They might consider them unreliable, might start imagining how a jury would react to these clients on the stand. But Mitchell, he took them on.
ALEXA MACPHERSON (a Garabedian client): I was three or four when it started. I would be coloring at the dining room table, and Father Kanchong would put me on his lap. I always thought it was like a pack of Life Savers in his pocket. And then I would feel wet on my pants, and it would be him ejaculating.
He would come over for lunch. He would come over for dinner. Birthday parties, weddings—you name it, he was there. The only break I ever got from him was when I went to Disney for a week. Other than that, I saw him every day of my life until the day he was caught.
He would threaten my animals, would threaten me, would tell me my mother and father won’t love me anymore. They’ll send me away. This is how you show respect to a priest. Two of my brothers were molested and raped by the same priest. He said he would get my brother locked up, because he was dabbling in drugs and alcohol and attempted suicide, all stemming from the abuse.
I was nine and a half when my father caught him trying to rape me on the living room couch. Because of how much I had been threatened, I said it was just a one-time thing, even though it had been happening on almost a daily basis for many, many years. It’s not like my brothers, who got through the bulk of their childhoods and had created memories before the abuse started. My life was the abuse.
I was a senior in high school when my brother asked me to come forward with him. We tried to pursue Kanchong, but we weren’t able to prosecute him criminally because the statute of limitations had run out. Then one day, my brother’s ex-wife was reading an article about Mitchell Garabedian, the lawyer handling the James Porter clergy abuse case. She called him for us, and he said, “Come on in.”
Mitchell was one of the very first people who, with no strings attached, said, “I believe you. Now here’s what I’m going to do for you.”
GARABEDIAN AND MACPHERSON (in conversation at Garabedian’s office,
September 11, 2017):
GARABEDIAN: This was not a monetary endeavor for me. It was like, if I go broke doing this, I go broke doing this. Senior lawyers would stop me on the street and say, “The church is going to crush you.” I just said, “This has to be done. It’s cruel, it’s evil.” How could I not do this? What kind of value do I have as a human being? What kind of person am I?
KACHADORIAN: He was a pit bull, and he was always underestimated by the old Boston lawyers who thought, “Oh, we can handle this kid.” Well, he’d outmaneuver them constantly. He’d just conquer in court.
GARABEDIAN: Because of the First Amendment’s establishment clause, we couldn’t just go to court and say we wanted to look at the church’s conduct. Based on documents we had that indicated wrongful conduct, I had to file a motion to obtain further documents until finally we were able to establish enough evidence to ask the judge to allow us to obtain the Secret Files, which held the most incriminating evidence. Canon law states in writing, “Sexual abuse cases, when looked into, should be kept secret.” Canon law also says church officials had to keep records of complaints and personnel issues. There were more than 10,000 documents on Geoghan alone. In canon law, they are really called the Secret Files.
REZENDES: Mitchell was able to take the most explosive of the church documents that had been sealed by a judge, and get them into the public record. Those documents led to the first Spotlight story—but it was Mitchell’s strategy of getting them into the public record that allowed me to finally get my hands on them.
GARABEDIAN: The import of the Secret Files was that they showed Cardinal Bernard Law (Hon.’84) knew that Geoghan was sexually molesting children before he transferred him to St. Julia’s Parish in Weston and didn’t warn the parishioners.
GARABEDIAN: When they receive a hot complaint—a mother saying, “Do something”—their idea of doing something was not to report the priest to the police or warn the parishioners, it was to get him out of Dodge. They just transferred, transferred.
MACPHERSON: All they wanted to protect was the appearance of the church. They didn’t care about what Kanchong did to me. They didn’t investigate it. They didn’t report him. They turned him loose. They turned their backs.
GARABEDIAN AND MACPHERSON:
GARABEDIAN: Now, they had—and still have—centers for the treatment of pedophilia. Another sham. They use code words like “alcoholism” when they send priests to these treatment centers, and they pay the centers a lot of money to say what the supervisors of the church would want them to say.
REZENDES: In Massachusetts, we have the doctrine of charitable immunity; what that means is if you sue a charity, you can’t collect more than $20,000. So, Mitchell sued Geoghan’s superiors instead. He filed 84 lawsuits on behalf of Geoghan’s victims, and those cases were settled without trial. In most of the cases, the statute of limitations had expired—but Geoghan had recently groped a boy in the swimming pool at the Waltham Boys and Girls Club, and the statute of limitations had not yet expired. Geoghan was tried criminally and convicted of sexual assault. He was murdered in prison. Cardinal Law resigned as archbishop of Boston and fled to the Vatican, where he was appointed the archpriest of the Basilica of St. Mary Major, one of the most significant churches in Rome.
ROBERT HOATSON (a Garabedian client and the founder of Road to Recovery, a nonprofit that assists victims of clergy sex abuse): I was a Catholic priest, and I am a victim myself of childhood sexual abuse. I testified in May 2013 before the New York State Legislature, and I was fired by the archbishop of my district for calling for the resignation of any bishop who has covered up sex abuse. I had been directing two inner-city schools in the Archdiocese of Newark, and the priest who replaced me was removed four months later because he inappropriately touched an eighth grade boy. That boy was in our school because he had already been touched inappropriately in fourth grade, in the parish next door.
The church is a magnet to abusers. For anybody who is petrified of their sexuality, it’s a great place to hide. But it’s such a strong urge that the altar boy, when he’s alone with the priest, begins to look like somebody he can have power over.
MACPHERSON: You’ve got the priest telling you this is how you obey God, and you don’t want God to be mad at you—worse yet, you don’t want your mother to be mad at you, do you?
HOATSON: We’re told that the priest is the closest thing to God on earth, and therefore what the priest says is gospel. Do you know what the priest says? “No one’s going to believe you.”
MACPHERSON: How do you tell your mother, who’s extremely religious, that a priest is molesting you? I didn’t even know those words, so how did I know it was wrong?
HOATSON: With clients, Mitch is as sensitive and compassionate as can be. One of his favorite lines is, “I’m very sorry to have to ask you this. ” Then he says, “But I have to know the whole story.” He has us sign releases sent to our schools, doctors. He gets medical records and criminal reports, and he puts together this package—always with the intention of proving your story, rather than proving you’re wrong.
GARABEDIAN: The damages are endless and everlasting for many victims. When you meet victims, you see an adult, but picture that person as a child and see how vulnerable they are. Many victims still have that little afraid child in them who was sexually abused.
MACPHERSON: I was part of an $86 million settlement with over 500 people. There were so many of us, and there was so much proof because of the church’s own records, they had to settle. Every one of us had to meet with arbitrators who listened to our case, looked over some documentation, and made a financial assessment, anywhere from zero to $300,000, the maximum at the time for any one survivor. They put a dollar figure on your suffering, and I don’t know anybody that got the $300,000.
GARABEDIAN: The church doesn’t want to help. If they did they wouldn’t be doing it as a business deal. When I was mediating with the church’s lawyers in the Geoghan cases, they offered me $10 million on behalf of his 86 victims. They wanted me not to take another Geoghan case and to sign confidentiality agreements. I told them I would be right back. I got in my car and left, and that was my answer.
I’m not doing this so the church will give me $10 million. They didn’t understand that—and they were afraid of the fact that I wouldn’t accept the money. They flooded me with legal work. Three times they went to court to tell the judge I violated ethical rules to try to have my law license taken away.
In 2004, I finally got the legislature to pass mandatory reporting for priests. Before that statute was passed, priests and a broad range of individuals who had the care of children were not mandated reporters of child abuse. In 2014, I worked with other lawyers to amend the statute of limitations in Massachusetts so victims could sue a perpetrator until age 53, and the supervisors of the institution within seven years of discovering that the conduct caused them harm. Before the amendment, it was age 21 and three years. That is an improvement, but it leaves a lot of victims out in the cold. The church has spent millions upon millions of dollars with lobbyists to oppose amending the statute of limitations.
It’s the church’s moral responsibility not to oppose amendments to the statute of limitations, so laws can be created to help sexual abuse victims obtain justice, and try to heal. It is an uphill battle, but I am used to uphill battles. People ask me, “How can you do it?” It is a lot of work. I go to the gym to clear my head, find my balance, but it’s an enormous amount of work.
MACPHERSON: I’ve never really known Mitch to take a vacation, I can tell you that much.
REZENDES: He’s very private. I’ve known Mitch 15 years, maybe more, and we’ve been out to lunch a few times, but I’ve never had a beer or been to a ball game with him. I’ve never done anything social with him.
KACHADORIAN: He’s kind of like the Lone Ranger. He really is a loner. There have been women he’s gotten close to, but I think he enjoys being a bachelor and not having distractions.
GARABEDIAN: I just kind of do what I do. I’m single, never been married, don’t have any children. I live alone. I’m heterosexual. It’s just the way my life is. I feel as though I’m trying to help children by doing the work I do, and hopefully it will make a difference.
GARABEDIAN AND MACPHERSON:
MACPHERSON: My daughters will be 11 and 13 this year. I ask them to tell me anything that happens, and that no matter what it is, I won’t be mad at them. I make sure nobody touches them. My brother built literal walls—a nine-foot-high stockade fence—around his property so no one could see in. I didn’t do that. I have my own issues with letting my daughters go on playdates or sleep over at friends’ houses. But they don’t deserve to have me overshadow their lives because of what happened to me, because then how are they going to become self-sufficient women? It’s not that I trust other people; it’s that I trust them more.
GARABEDIAN: I am still going uphill. I have in excess of 500 cases. I’m 65 years old, and this is going to outlive me. Do I think the church is going to change? Not in my lifetime. But I see victims coming forward with this ray of hope in them. They want to change their lives and protect their children. They want the world to know they did nothing wrong. That is encouraging.
One morning, as I walked into the kitchen, I heard a man speaking on the radio. His style of speaking kind of reminded me of President Kennedy. “ Who is that,” I asked my sister, who was going about her daily routine while listening. “Is he a politician?” “No,” she answered, “he’s a lawyer.” Attorney Garabedian literally knock me off my feet as he gave his argument against the Catholic Church’s active role for children being abused by their priests. I could feel the attorney’s stance and passion as he presented his case. I had to take a seat in order to catch my breathe.
Every so often I think about that moment especially the attorney, not just for representing his clients, but also advocating for them… and for Justice. Both Today’s current story about the state troopers and the city of Boston is what brought this lawyer to mind. So, where is he and what is he doing?
If manhood is defined as defending the innocent, Garabedian defines manhood, boldly and without apology. I can’t imagine what he has privately suffered because of his journey,
Moreover, I can’t understand the cognitive dissonance with which Catholics continue to put money into collection baskets, to finance predators” defense attorneys, while continuing to take their own children into harm’s way. Any church that conceals the shuffling of predatory sex rings is not a real church. Any *Catholic* affiliate that through inaction and neglect does not confront fraudulent authorities is not of God. People are financing and therefore enabling the monster.
We also need more organizations that are structured to educate people about religious business fraud and sex trafficking.
It’s revolting that BU Today rehash this 15-year-old story of abuse cases in this way. I understand the desire to celebrate an alumnus, but the tone of this piece suggests that the abuse is ongoing not only around the world, but here in Boston. However, a Boston Globe report from 2016 says Garabedian’s ongoing practice is hearing from “hundreds of victims around the world continue to come forward, including some who say they were attacked as recently as 2001.” At some point, you have to stop focusing on the period with problems, and start asking if the corrections instituted by the Church were effective. In that regard, it’s important to note that Cardinal Law started pushing the USCCB for improved child protections in the early 1990’s. Were those effective? Well, in 2003 Laurie Goldstein of the New York Times reported abuse reports dropped by more than half from the 1980’s to the 1990’s.
Did this the reporter contact St Luke’s or Institute for Living or any other of the treatment institutions Garabedian called “shams”? His description is a de facto accusation that Law and other bishops set up these centers as legal cover, rather than in accord with known clinical practice. I remember hearing in the mid-1990’s that this pedophilia/ephebophilia could be “cured,” and thinking “I would not believe that in a million years.” Several treatment centers have been involved, I know one (neither St Luke’s nor Institute for Living) that was praised by a non-Boston priest that I know – shouldn’t they all be consulted about the legitimacy of their clinical practices?
It’s observations and questions like these – basic reportorial practice! – that make regular Catholics, many of us knowing innocent priests knocked out of ministry for months before being exonerated – suspicious of the reporting. And I’m one who saw many of the guilty priests and said “good riddance.” And after eight or ten years of hell every time they wore their clericals, today’s priests are happier that the Geoghans and Shanleys and their ilk are gone.
Harvey Weinstein is a current story looking every bit as sordid as Geoghan’s. Senator Menendez, after facing corruption charges, stands to face charges associated with foreign child prostitution. This in addition to horrifying reports from some of the most prestigious boarding schools in the country – within 100 miles of Boston. We see that sexual abuse is a problem not in any way limited to the Catholic Church. So why are we going back to 2002 so that we can flog Cardinal Law yet one more time?
I’m disappointed at the sloppy and accusatory reporting misrepresenting the current situation in the Church, with a take no prisoners, accept no apology, report no correction animus.
– Andrew Wolfe
The church hasn’t improved. They have spent about $3 million dollars fighting a change in the statute of limitation laws in NYS for the past 11 years to protect their predators. When my husband came forward the Diocese “victims advocate” lied about who he worked for, then promptly told the priest who raped my husband his name and what accusation was made. This priest has been on the radar since the 70s. He lives next to a school. The Diocese agreed to pay for my husbands therapy immediately, (why?), but continued to harass us over the phone and undermine my husbands progress in treatment. I (a registered nurse), and his doctor had to step in and get them to STOP calling because of the trauma they were invoking. The diocese tried to lure my husband into treatment with one of their therapists at their treatment center, which is illegal. When my husband refused they sent my husband’s therapist a letter stating my husband better understand “the ramifications of his decision”. They stated they would no longer investigate my husbands complaint and got their lawyers involved to stop paying for my husbands therapy. Ours is not an unusual case. You can easily find how they protect predators over victims. Their “treatment facilities” for priests have been investigated and their is no cure for child raping priests. Just look up how the send their predators to South America now. An 80 yr old former priest was re-arrested for molesting again. Look up the Altoona-Johnstown grand jury investigation, The new accusations against a Brooklyn diocese priest recently accused by 25 women. All these are current stories. Look up how we have to continue to fight the church to get the Child Victims Act passed in NY. You may not like the tone of the article but there’s good reason for it.
Excellent article, however Mitch is not in the Deep South . We report and get altar boy jokes , prank phone calls and if one persists death threats.
When will you and others in the media attempt to remove Cardinal Bernard Law from his posh position at the Vatican ?
If Garabedian is such a {wildcat} release him on that journey.
After all, it’s Law that allowed John J Geoghan to keep on abusing.
You can’t fight Vatican City. They are there own sovereign state with there own laws. the do not extradite there own and without that there is no way to bring charges against Law or the Vatican. They feel there laws are above the laws of men.
Does anybody other than the RCC make saints? They will never cede sainthood to this man, but someone should.