Jon Feingold

Jonathan Feingold

Associate Professor


BA, Vassar College
JD, UCLA School of Law


Biography

Jonathan Feingold’s scholarship explores the relationship between race, law, and the mind sciences. Much of his recent research has interrogated how and why various American legal regimes, including equal protection doctrine, function to reinforce and reproduce racial hierarchy. His work has appeared or is forthcoming in the California Law Review, Northwestern University Law Review, Utah Law Review, and Temple Law Review. Representative publications include “SFFA v. Harvard: How Affirmative Action Myths Mask White Bonus,” “Hidden in Plain Sight: a More Compelling Case for Diversity,” “Eyes Wide Open: What Social Science Can Tell Us About the Supreme Court’s Use of Social Science” (with Evelyn Carter), and “Defusing Implicit Bias” (with Karen Lorang). Jonathan also hosts #RaceClass, a monthly conversation that explores how race and racism remain powerful forces in American society.

From 2015 through 2019, Feingold served as special assistant to the vice chancellor for equity, diversity & inclusion at the University of California, Los Angeles and was a research fellow in BruinX, a research and development team within the Office of Equity, Diversity & Inclusion. He is the co-founder of illuminate diversity consulting, a private consulting firm that employs an interdisciplinary approach to foster inclusion through candid, data-driven conversation. 

Feingold received his BA from Vassar College and holds a JD from UCLA School of Law, where he graduated with a specialization in critical race studies. After law school, he joined Sidley Austin LLP as an associate in the firm’s Los Angeles office. He then clerked for the Hon. Richard C. Wesley of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and the Hon. Dale S. Fischer of the United States District Court for the Central District of California. 

In 2014, he received a California Lawyer Attorneys of the Year Award for work done in connection with Rodriguez v. Robbins, a case concerning immigrant detainees’ rights to bond hearings.  

Publications

Scroll left to right to view all publications

  • Jonathan Feingold, The Right to Inequality: Conservative Politics and Precedent Collide 57 Connecticut Law Review (2024)
    Scholarly Commons
  • Jonathan Feingold & Joshua Weishart, Discriminatory Censorship Laws Tulane Law Review (2024)
    Scholarly Commons
  • Athena Mutua & Jonathan Feingold, The War on Higher Education 72 UCLA Law Review (2024)
    Scholarly Commons
  • Jonathan Feingold, Constitutionalizing Racism 104 Boston University Law Review Online (2024) (book review)
    Scholarly Commons
  • How Discriminatory Censorship Laws Imperil Public Education
    Scholarly Commons
  • Jonathan Feingold, Ambivalent Advocates: Why Elite Universities Compromised the Case for Affirmative Action 58 Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review (2023)
    Scholarly Commons
  • Jonathan Feingold, Affirmative Action After SFFA 48 Journal of College and University Law (2023)
    Scholarly Commons
  • Jonathan Feingold, Colorblind Capture 102 Boston University Law Review (2022)
    Scholarly Commons
  • Brief of Legal Scholars Defending Race-Conscious Admissions as Amici Curiae in Support of Respondents, SFFA v. Harvard (20-1199) and SFFA v. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (21-707)
    Scholarly Commons
  • Jonathan Feingold & Devon Carbado, Rewriting Whren v. United States 68 UCLA Law Review (2022)
    Scholarly Commons
  • Jonathan Feingold, Reclaiming Equality: How Regressive Laws Can Advance Progressive Ends 73 South Carolina Law Review (2022)
    Scholarly Commons
  • Angela Onwuachi-Willig & Jonathan Feingold, Critical Race Judgments: Rewritten U.S. Court Opinions on Race and Law (2022)
    Scholarly Commons
  • Jonathan Feingold, Civil Rights Catch 22s 43 Cardozo Law Review (2022)
    Scholarly Commons
  • Jonathan Feingold, Deficit Frame Dangers 37 Georgia State University Law Review (2021)
    Scholarly Commons
  • Jonathan Feingold, "All (Poor) Lives Matter": How Class-Not-Race Logic Reinscribes Race and Class Privilege University of Chicago Law Review Online (2020)
    Scholarly Commons
  • Jonathan Feingold, SFFA v. Harvard: How Affirmative Action Myths Mask White Bonus 107 California Law Review (2019)
    Scholarly Commons
  • Jonathan Feingold, Equal Protection Design Defects 91 Temple Law Review (2019)
    Scholarly Commons
  • Jonathan Feingold, Hidden in Plain Sight: A More Compelling Case for Diversity 2019 Utah Law Review (2019)
    Scholarly Commons
  • Jonathan Feingold, Diversity Drift 9 Wake Forest Law Review Online (2019)
    Scholarly Commons
  • Jonathan Feingold & Evelyn Carter, Eyes Wide Open: What Social Science Can Tell Us About the Supreme Court's Use of Social Science 112 Northwestern University Law Review Online (2018)
    Scholarly Commons
  • Jonathan Feingold & Doug Souza, Measuring the Racial Unevenness of Law School 15 Berkeley Journal of African-American Law & Policy (2013)
    Scholarly Commons
  • Jonathan Feingold & Karen Lorang, Defusing Implicit Bias 59 UCLA Law Review Discourse (2012)
    Scholarly Commons
  • Jonathan Feingold, Racing Towards Colorblindness: Stereotype Threat and the Myth of Meritocracy 3 Georgetown Journal of Law and Modern Critical Race Perspectives (2011)
    Scholarly Commons

In the Media

Scroll left to right to view all in the media posts

  • BU Today July 1, 2025

    25 Charles River Campus Faculty Receive Promotions

    Jonathan Feingold, Scott Hirst, and Steve Koh are highighted.
    read more

  • The Emancipator June 12, 2025

    Why, and How, Journalists Must Cover Racism

    Jonathan Feingold is quoted.
    read more

  • The Hill June 8, 2025

    Trump’s War Against DEI Isn’t Going So Well in Virginia

    Jonathan Feingold pens an opinion.
    read more

  • In These Times June 4, 2025

    “I Am Not Afraid”

    Jonathan Feingold is quoted.
    read more

  • The Philadelphia Hall Monitor May 13, 2025

    HOME Plan Still Not Clear Enough for Council; Education Committee Rails Against Trump’s Punitive DEI Policies

    Jonathan Feingold is quoted.
    read more

  • Philly Voice May 9, 2025

    Lawmakers, Education Leaders Condemn Penn for Dropping DEI Protections in Response to Executive Order

    Jonathan Feingold is quoted.
    read more

  • wgbh April 28, 2025

    Boston Area Jewish Students Reflect on Trump’s Fight Against Antisemitism

    Jonathan Feingold is quoted.
    read more

  • The Attitude with Arnie Arnesen April 25, 2025

    The Attitude with Arnie Arnesen

    Jonathan Feingold is interviewed.
    read more

  • The Boston Globe April 22, 2025

    WilmerHale Will Face Off Against the Trump Administration in Court This Week. Where Does the Rest of Big Law Stand?

    Jonathan Feingold is quoted.
    read more

  • The Boston Globe April 18, 2025

    Don’t Praise Harvard Just Yet

    Jonathan Feingold pens an opinion.
    read more

  • wgbh April 15, 2025

    GBH Daily: Harvard Won’t Comply with Trump Demands

    Jonathan Feingold is quoted.
    read more

  • The Daily Free Press April 2, 2025

    ‘Not in Our Name’: Jewish Professors, Students, University Staff Denounce the Weaponization of Antisemitism Against Pro-Palestinian Advocacy

    Jonathan Feingold is quoted.
    read more

  • The Daily Free Press

    ‘The Right to Hear’: Professors Sue Trump Administration for Detention of Students Engaging in Pro-Palestininan Activities

    Jonathan Feingold is quoted.
    read more

  • LPE Project March 27, 2025

    Eight Legal Experts on Trump’s Assault on Higher Education

    Jonathan Feingold and Sarah Sherman-Stokes co-author an opinion.
    read more

  • WCAI March 25, 2025

    Trump’s DEI Rollback Impacts Local Science Education

    Jonathan Feingold is interviewed.
    read more

  • View All Articles

Stories from The Record

View All Stories

Activities & Engagements

No upcoming activities or engagements.

View All Activities & Engagements

Courses

Critical Race Theory: LAW JD 731

3 credits

In the mid-1980s, a scholarly movement to become known as "Critical Race Theory" (CRT) developed in legal academia. Early critical race theorists--including Derrick Bell, Mari Matsuda, Charles Lawrence, Richard Delgado, Kimberle Crenshaw, and Patricia Williams--challenged the substance and style of conventional legal scholarship. Substantively, race crits rejected formal equality, individual rights, and colorblind approaches to solving legal problems. Stylistically, critical race scholars often employed new methodologies for legal scholarship, including storytelling and narrative. The Critical Race Theory Colloquium is designed to expose students to core CRT principles and interrogate CRT's possibilities and limitations. This endeavor will require students to think critically about race and racism in conjunction with other intersecting structures of oppression and hierarchy. The Critical Race Theory Colloquium employs a workshop-format that enables students to engage leading scholars in the field of Critical Race Theory. The first part of the semester will involve a general overview of Critical Race Theory. During the remaining meetings, invited scholars will present works-in-progress for discussion. To prepare, students will write short reaction papers that include three questions for further discussion. Final grades depend on the reaction papers, class participation, and attendance. UPPER-CLASS WRITING REQUIREMENT: This class may not be used to satisfy the requirement. **A student who fails to attend the initial meeting of a seminar (designated by an (S) in the title), or to obtain permission to be absent from either the instructor or the Registrar, may be administratively dropped from the seminar. Students who are on a wait list for a seminar are required to attend the first seminar meeting to be considered for enrollment.

FALL 2025: LAW JD 731 A1 , Sep 2nd to Dec 19th 2025
Days Start End Credits Instructors Bldg Room
Tue 2:10 pm 4:10 pm 3 Jonathan Feingold

Education Law and Policy: LAW JD 777

3 credits

In this course, we will examine the relationship between law, public policy, and current issues in education at both the K-12 and higher ed levels. Major themes will include campus safety and privacy; the right to an equal and quality education (with a focus on desegregation and resegregation); constitutional issues in public schools (including religious considerations and student freedom of expression); and structures of educational governance and various school reforms. Related topics of engagement will likely include policing in schools, ongoing legal battles over race-conscious practices and policies, the unmet needs of English language learners, and the impact of the charter school movement. Course assessment will include a take home examination. Class participation will also factor into final grades.

FALL 2025: LAW JD 777 A1 , Sep 2nd to Dec 19th 2025
Days Start End Credits Instructors Bldg Room
Tue,Thu 11:00 am 12:25 pm 3 Jonathan Feingold

Property: LAW JD 876

4 credits

Conceptual analysis and underlying policy considerations in basic property law.

SPRG 2026: LAW JD 876 A1 , Jan 12th to May 8th 2026
Days Start End Credits Instructors Bldg Room
Fri 10:30 am 11:45 am 4
Tue,Thu 10:45 am 12:00 pm 4
SPRG 2026: LAW JD 876 B1 , Jan 12th to May 8th 2026
Days Start End Credits Instructors Bldg Room
Fri 10:30 am 11:45 am 4
Tue,Thu 10:45 am 12:00 pm 4
SPRG 2026: LAW JD 876 C1 , Jan 12th to May 8th 2026
Days Start End Credits Instructors Bldg Room
Tue,Thu 2:10 pm 4:10 pm 4 Jonathan Feingold
SPRG 2026: LAW JD 876 D1 , Jan 12th to Apr 22nd 2026
Days Start End Credits Instructors Bldg Room
Mon,Wed 2:10 pm 4:10 pm 4 Linda C. McClain
SPRG 2026: LAW JD 876 E1 , Jan 12th to Apr 22nd 2026
Days Start End Credits Instructors Bldg Room
Tue,Thu 8:30 am 10:30 am 4 Stern