Comments & Discussion

Boston University moderates comments to facilitate an informed, substantive, civil conversation. Abusive, profane, self-promotional, misleading, incoherent or off-topic comments will be rejected. Moderators are staffed during regular business hours (EST) and can only accept comments written in English. Statistics or facts must include a citation or a link to the citation.

There are 4 comments on Brown Calls for Balance to Survive Recession

  1. President Brown was not being transparent when he said that no faculty layoffs would occur because faculty are critical to the mission of the university. In point of fact, 6 faculty in the Division of Natural Science at the College of General Studies have been told that they will not be returning next year. Brown’s retort to this point at the town meeting was that those layoffs occurred because of reduced enrollments. However, since the freshman class has not yet been admitted and since he states 38,000 students have applied to BU for next fall, one wonders what on Earth he is talking about in terms of reduced enrollment.

    The fact is that CGS and the administration cut a year of science from the CGS program. Rather than go with a proposed smaller class size for science (~50 students per faculty member instead of ~100), the President and Provost chose to chuck the 6 professors and save probably a half a million in salaries and benefits. Thus, class size will stay high and students will be less educated in science — in a world where science is going to become increasingly important. How does this decision serve students?

    Want transparency? Let the truth be known and don’t brush aside what is really going on.

  2. I think it is wonderful that the administration is facing this monumental problem head on instead of going forth in denial. I think having a town meeting and sending out a letter to the faculty and staff is very wise. We all need to understand what is facing us so we can prepare by doing what we need to do to make sure we weather the storm, with the least amount of damage to the educational product we are offering, to the research we are doing and to the entire mission of the University.

    Making scholarship money available will be essential and is important also to our nation. I would hate to go back to a time when qualified students did not go to college because they could not afford it. The Great Depression era limited choices for many, for that reason.

    I remember a time at this University when we suffered from a high attrition rate. Financial aid will be required to keep the students already matriculated at the University enrolled at BU, instead of transferring to a cheaper school or just quitting college all together. If we do not offer aid to those students already here, whose family have lost their employment and home, we will be downsizing on both fronts. It is not just about incoming freshman, it is about keeping the students here for the full four years.

    The fact is that there are duplications of activities that could be consolidated in order to save money. There are activities that could be put on hold until we reach a better economic climate, without changing the quality of education we offer.

    I would rather participate with intent in that process, than to find we are in the red and have to just arbitraily make cuts.

  3. If the adminstration were truly concerned about students and the educational product they provide, it would cut administrative bloat and reduce the salaries of current administrators to reasonable levels. Administrators do not add to the educational mission of the university — they are excessively paid middle managers, many of whom are totally unnecessary (and whose jobs never existed a decade ago). Their salaries, benefits, and staffs (which they all have because they are not going to do the grunt work themselves) cost a fortune and contribute largely to the operating expenses of the university. Instead the administration cuts faculty in one college, cuts a fantastic center with its environmental programs, and still has a deficit. If Brown continues in this vein, eventually BU will be an administratively ladden technical school with untenured adjunct-level faculty (already seen in a number of BU schools) . Some educational mission that will be.

Post a comment.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *