Comments & Discussion

Boston University moderates comments to facilitate an informed, substantive, civil conversation. Abusive, profane, self-promotional, misleading, incoherent or off-topic comments will be rejected. Moderators are staffed during regular business hours (EST) and can only accept comments written in English. Statistics or facts must include a citation or a link to the citation.

There is 1 comment on Tagging, Pre-Facebook

  1. In the real world, over 99.9% of graffiti is not art, it is 100% pure defacement of public and private property. There is no ‘art’ involved, just the tagger’s ego in seeing their tag in 1 million different places. It lowers property values and makes the areas where it is done look like slums where there is no civic pride. The ‘artists’ should be prosecuted and the punishment should involve removing graffiti, even if they have to use toothpicks to get every last bit of paint off.

    On the other hand, there certainly is some artistic talent out there, but they should only ‘tag’ where they have permission from the property owner, no exceptions! And, no you do not ‘own’ public property, so unless city hall allows you to paint something, it is off limits. If you made graffiti a ballot question, the people opposed to it would win by a major landslide.

    Here is a great example of wall mural done on a new pet store in North Weymouth.
    http://www.patriotledger.com/photos/x587878697/North-Weymouth-wall-mural-catches-eyes#axzz2WCAFXE6Z
    This was a paid job done with the store owner’s permission. This is an all-to-rare exception to the graffiti is vandalism rule. Another great example of art in public spaces is Sidewalk Sam and other sidewalk chalk artists. Great work, but temporary, so no permanent damage to public property.

Post a comment.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *