Tight Pants, Pubic Hair Removal Could Trigger Chronic Pain
Tight Pants, Pubic Hair Removal Could Trigger Chronic Pain
BU study is the first to show a link between clothing, grooming, and vulvodynia

Vulvodynia is a condition characterized by chronic, debilitating vulvar pain. Although it affects an estimated 16 percent of women over their lifetimes, very little is known about the condition or what might cause it.
Now, a Boston University School of Public Health study led by graduate researchers offers some new clues, finding that the risk of vulvodynia is increased by wearing tight-fitting jeans or pants or by removing hair from the mons pubis (the soft mound of skin above the genitals). Published in the Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease, it is the first study to show a link between clothing, grooming, and the condition.
“Microabrasions to this sensitive area [caused by hair removal] may predispose young women to immune-inflammatory complications,” says study senior author Bernard Harlow, an SPH professor of epidemiology. “Likewise, tight-fitting jeans or pants can create an environment that fosters genital tract infections, which have been shown to be associated with vulvar pain onset.”
[Vulvodynia is] very underdiagnosed because of the stigma.
The study participants were made up of 213 women between the ages of 18 and 40 with clinically confirmed cases of vulvodynia and were from a large healthcare network in the Minneapolis/Saint Paul metropolitan area. The researchers analyzed this group of women’s self-reported histories of personal hygiene behaviors a year before onset of vulvar pain, and then compared that information with self-reported personal hygiene behaviors during a similar time period among 221 women—in the same healthcare network and age range—who had no history of vulvar discomfort.
They found that women who wore tight-fitting jeans or pants four or more times per week had twice the odds of vulvodynia compared to women who never or rarely did. Roughly 70 percent of the women in both groups reported removing pubic hair, but those who removed hair from the mons pubis were 74 percent more likely to experience vulvodynia than women who only removed hair from the bikini area. Compared with women who reported removing only bikini-area hair less than monthly, those who removed hair from the mons pubis weekly or more were nearly twice as likely to experience vulvodynia.
The study was led by three Master in Public Health students, for whom it was the Integrative Learning Experience—a practical-skills part of the MPH program. Conducting the study “was just an incredible opportunity we were given, and we could not pass it up,” says Alexandra Klann (SPH’18). Tanran Wang (SPH’18), now a data analyst in the SPH department of epidemiology, agrees. “Getting to be involved in real research is very exciting, and it’s a great experience to transition from student to professional,” she says.
Wang says it was also a learning experience to conduct a study on a little-known condition, one she had never heard of before working with Harlow. “It’s very underdiagnosed because of the stigma attached to it,” she says. “It was important for me to know that this is a highly prevalent condition, and that there are women out there who are embarrassed to talk about it.”
Jessica Rosenberg (SPH’18), now a data analyst at Boston Medical Center, says there is a lot of work left to do to eliminate gender disparities in acute and chronic pain treatment, “but I am hopeful that this study’s findings will lead to further research into evidence-based predictors of vulvodynia, and improve physicians’ understanding of and treatment of this condition.”
Samantha Parker, an SPH assistant professor of epidemiology, was also a study coauthor.
Comments & Discussion
Boston University moderates comments to facilitate an informed, substantive, civil conversation. Abusive, profane, self-promotional, misleading, incoherent or off-topic comments will be rejected. Moderators are staffed during regular business hours (EST) and can only accept comments written in English. Statistics or facts must include a citation or a link to the citation.