• Andrew Thurston

    Editor, The Brink Twitter Profile

    Photo of Andrew Thurston, a white man with black glasses. He smiles and wears a maroon polo shirt.

    Andrew Thurston is originally from England, but has grown to appreciate the serial comma and the Red Sox, while keeping his accent (mostly) and love of West Ham United. He joined BU in 2007, and is the editor of the University’s research news site, The Brink; he was formerly director of alumni publications. Before joining BU, he edited consumer and business magazines, including for corporations, nonprofits, and the UK government. His work has won awards from the Council for Advancement and Support of Education, the In-House Agency Forum, Folio:, and the British Association of Communicators in Business. Andrew has a bachelor’s degree in English and related literature from the University of York. Profile

Comments & Discussion

Boston University moderates comments to facilitate an informed, substantive, civil conversation. Abusive, profane, self-promotional, misleading, incoherent or off-topic comments will be rejected. Moderators are staffed during regular business hours (EST) and can only accept comments written in English. Statistics or facts must include a citation or a link to the citation.

There are 4 comments on Are Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Initiatives Helping Workers—or Dividing Them?

  1. A quick skim of Google Scholar suggests that multiple demographics (e.g. people with disabilities, LGBTQ+ people, and I’m sure way more) appear to essentially be an afterthought in DEI research.

    It’s also quite telling that this article itself is filed under the “antiracism” category. While antiracism is surely very important, it’s by far shouldn’t be a pursuit disjoint from other areas and it seems really reductive to file an article about DEI in general exclusively under such.

    This instance of categorization and what research is going on supports my anecdotal observation of a priority hierarchy I’ve seen in DEI work. First comes race, then (binary) gender, then sexual orientation, then religion, then disability, and usually in an American context.

    If this is going to work, the work needs to be intersectional, multifaceted, and holistic. It isn’t enough to almost entirely focus on American Blackness and womanhood in a compartmentalized vacuum and with tunnel vision.

    1. “I’ve seen DEI work”. …..for whom, and under what circumstances?

      Your assertion echoes the problems in the research. Most studies are based on qualitative and self-reported data, which is highly subjective and cognitively biased by ‘enthusiasm’ for and desire for a positive outcome. This doesn’t mean they work on any or all contexts.

      If anecdotal evidence really means anything, then we ought to examine the overwhelming reports in society that DEI is incredibly divisive and therefore not a stretch to believe that it doesn’t improve organisational culture or performance at all. Scientific scepticism requires that this be the default position until proven otherwise.

  2. The interviewee points out that equity is the goal of DEI initiatives. But most people don’t understand what equity is, nor do they distinguish it from equality, which really should be the main game.

    Equity is effective a charitable state created for minority groups, which are perceived to be disadvantaged in a context, and implemented via specific concessions for those groups in the hope that it will provide a pathway for participation for them. Fair enough. The problem is that equity is extremely narrowly focussed and an exclusive premise; so the idea that it can have far reaching transformation effects on organisational performance is unreasonable. 0re-occupations with equity inevitably get weighed down by division and politics rendering them ineffective. Despite this, equity initiatives are generalised as though their efficacy is a forgone conclusion. Not so. I’m fact there is virtually no evidence to that effect.

    What about Equality?

    If you truly want inclusively, then organisations should look no further than equality, which by definition provides everyone with a fair go. No one gets special treatment or concessions, so it is not divisive. It is the basis of meritocracy.l and promotion gets awarded by performance. That is the goal organisations should aspire to – not politics which consists of quotas, and ‘diversity for the sakes of appearances’, unity not division.

    My advice to anyone who feels discriminated against….find an organisation that values your unique bio, don’t require or expect an organisation that doesn’t want to, to accommodate you because you are different. Find one that authentically wants to.

Post a comment.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *