• Doug Most

    Associate Vice President, Executive Editor, Editorial Department Twitter Profile

    Doug Most is a lifelong journalist and author whose career has spanned newspapers and magazines up and down the East Coast, with stops in Washington, D.C., South Carolina, New Jersey, and Boston. He was named Journalist of the Year while at The Record in Bergen County, N.J., for his coverage of a tragic story about two teens charged with killing their newborn. After a stint at Boston Magazine, he worked for more than a decade at the Boston Globe in various roles, including magazine editor and deputy managing editor/special projects. His 2014 nonfiction book, The Race Underground, tells the story of the birth of subways in America and was made into a PBS/American Experience documentary. He has a BA in political communication from George Washington University. Profile

Comments & Discussion

Boston University moderates comments to facilitate an informed, substantive, civil conversation. Abusive, profane, self-promotional, misleading, incoherent or off-topic comments will be rejected. Moderators are staffed during regular business hours (EST) and can only accept comments written in English. Statistics or facts must include a citation or a link to the citation.

There are 73 comments on BU Graduate Students Are Set to Strike over Benefits and Pay

  1. This article is incredibly dishonest and presents the situation without any context. I would urge everyone to hear the other side of the story by looking at the union’s website and social media accounts: bugwu.org

    The University Management refused to provide even a single substantial proposal until they caught wind that grad workers were moving towards a strike. BUGWU requested to bargain in April 2023 and only received the first compensation offer in February 2024. Moreover, their counter-proposals all but ignored all of what BUGWU originally proposed, instead opting to restate the current BU policy in article formatting. I guess you can call that bargaining in good faith if we are defining it as fulfilling the strict legal requirement of not refusing to meet with the union’s bargaining representatives.

    The Management’s compensation offer is nothing but to enforce the status quo. Even after the raise salaried grads at BU are the lowest-paid grad workers in Boston at 31k on a 9-month appointment. Not to mention that most grads on 12-month appointments already make more than 41k per year which is effectively a wage freeze. The management has already announced a 4% cost-of-living adjustment separate from the negotiation process. Effectively they are offering a consistent 3% raise each year over the next 4 years, which is largely outpaced by inflation and rent increases and in effect a pay cut for most grads.

    Moreover, the management’s current proposal is especially outrageous if we consider the situation of grad workers on hourly appointments, who often make more than $18/hr already but still struggle to make ends meet due to the limited appointment hours and the lack of categorical tuition remission for these workers. Many of these workers are forced to spend the entirety of their paycheck on tuition and frequently have to take out loans just to avoid homelessness.

    The union’s proposal of $62,440 is both the average amount needed to not be rent burdened in BU housing and approximately the current living wage in Boston according to the MIT living wage calculator. It should not be controversial that grad workers should be able to afford to live in the city where we work.

    BU’s mission statement claims that “higher education should be accessible to all ” and endeavors to “understand the needs of others and commit to…relieve suffering.” But not making an effort to end rent burden, the management is forcing the University into a position of utter hypocrisy, because international grads, grads with dependents, and grads from low-income backgrounds bear the brunt of this struggle, and this is simply unacceptable. Instead of putting your effort into propaganda pieces as such you should actually try to take the demands of over 3000 grad workers seriously and finally start to bargain in good faith.

    For our community allies, I would urge you to communicate your support to grads you know either directly or by donating to our hardship fund here: https://givebutter.com/bugwufund

    1. “The union’s proposal of $62,440…should not be controversial.”

      Agreed. But shouldn’t being paid a full-time wage (on top of tuition and benefits) for part-time work be controversial? No wonder the University administration balks.

      1. This is a misleading excerpt from the original comment. The point of what is or is not controversial is whether graduate workers should be able to afford to live in Boston. If this is not something the university can align itself with, then their graduate education is only accessible to those with prior wealth.

      2. Sure that’s controversial, if you know nothing about graduate workers, and you accept without question the University’s lie that we only work 20 hours a week.

    2. FYI:

      Full time lecturers with PhDs at BU earn 65K a year base salary. At some colleges at BU this is the bulk of their teaching faculty. So, grad students are asking to earn the same amt as FT teaching faculty?

      Support staff earn around 62K.

      Do students know that many of their profs make less than 1 tuition + R&B?

        1. Hi anonymous, I bet your labor is worth more than $46.5K! Sounds like you could benefit from a union as well. This doesn’t have to be a zero-sum game of grads vs staff. :)

          1. We have a union L2324! Aren’t allowed to strike though, so we don’t have the same leverage. Hoping that any progress for grad students gets through to everyone else!

        2. My takeaway from this comment is not that grad workers shouldn’t get $62K but rather that you should be getting paid more as well. Everyone deserves a living wage. Pay your employees, BU!

        3. I think the “absurdity” needs to be re-framed here. I think anyone making $46k working full-time in a city like Boston is absurd.

          Grad workers are asking for a reasonable wage based on the living costs that BU sets, plus benefits that many of them desperately need but the university is unwilling to offer.

        4. Hi anonymous, most of the grad workers perform the same type of work as faculty and we are not allowed to take up outside employment during our degree program. The stipend is all we have to survive on during 5 – 7 years in Boston and there is no quitting for better employment opportunities because then you lose your degree progress.

          In my opinion, what is absurd here is that almost nobody at BU makes a living wage that could allow them to live in a city where they work and that is a deliberate choice on the management’s part. So I would encourage you to talk to your coworkers to see what you all are willing do to improve your working conditions and us grads will be there with you all the way,

          1. you are not allowed to get another part time job to help make some money??? I did not know this. (also don’t know if it is feasible given demands on your time for your programs). Keep educating people!

            The federal government, the FTC specifically, just nullified non-compete agreements. I would imagine this might apply to grad students….

        5. You deserve a living wage also! If you’re also unionized, a sizable salary win for graduate workers will give your union more leverage to raise wages for you too. A rising tide lifts all boats.

          Graduate students are often serving as more than just student workers, and the “20 hours” can be a bit misleading. When I worked as an instructor of record this summer, I had to put in far more than 20 hours. I ended up being paid the same amount as my teaching fellow, despite doing twice the amount of work. The University also bars us from working in any outside positions. This is our only paycheck, and we need to be able to afford to live on it.

          1. Have you not heard of student loans? You are getting free tuition and a stipend, the loan can help with living costs, that’s what I had to do.

        6. Hi!

          Would you like to unionize? It is sad to see that you are being paid less than the living wage. It is unfair for you to expect grad workers who are overworked and underpaid to settle for less because you are underpaid.

          1. We are a unionized group. Our union L2324 stands in solidarity with yours within the limitations of our contract. I am hoping that the grad union movement gives us momentum, but we are essentially frozen in place with the current contract (can’t strike, are asked to cross your picket line, etc).

            It’s sad for everyone, but know that should there be success for the grad student union, the staff union cannot replicate that success with a strike.

        7. So BU grad workers should remain underpaid because you are? Maybe the problem isn’t grad workers asking for living wages. Maybe the problem is that your employer underpaying you. A full-time staff member who only earns $46K pre-tax, living in Boston? now THATS absurd. You deserve more and so do we!

      1. I mean, this sounds like BU should be paying their teaching faculty more, not that grad students should get less. It also looks like $65k is the starting ask, I’m guessing they expect BU to negotiate them down from that (better to start high and end up with a better number than ask for the bare minimum and get negotiated down from that, no?)

      2. Maybe BU just simply underpays most of its employees? The issue is that BU also pays too little for its postdoc, research scientists, support staffs, and faculty, not that the PhD ask too much.

        Does teaching faculty and support staff have unions that can help them negotiate a better deal? As far as I know (and please correct me if I am wrong), there is no union for postdoc and research scientist, so at the end they could unfortunately be the one left behind.

      3. Wow, that adds perspective. Cost-of-living is going up across the board, so I can understand that many other groups must be feeling the squeeze as well. Do you feel like faculty and staff deserve to be paid more than they currently earn for their work? If so, maybe it would be worth having conversations with colleagues about how to collectively ask for a raise.

      4. I’m a full-time staff member (unionized) and I made barely $42,000 (before tax) last year. Our department keeps losing great workers largely due to low pay.

        BU needs to increase pay across the board. The low pay to faculty and staff is shameful considering how big our endowment is and how much we can apparently afford to pay execs. We pride ourselves in being leaders among our peers, so why are we fine with trailing behind the pack when it comes to wages?

    3. You noted that BU grad students are the lowest paid in Boston. Can you share what compensation is at other local Boston colleges?

      Also, how many grad student workers are there? Trying to learn about this issue.

  2. As the graduate worker quoted in this article, I think it’s important for readers to know that this is inaccurate and biased reporting. The BU today did not reach out to me for comments as they did for the administration and includes only two short quotes from Union sources. Speaking only for myself as a member of the BUGWU bargaining team, I hope the editors will consider reaching out to graduate workers directly for comments and representing the graduate workers’ side equally in the future—many of us would be happy to provide more accurate information.

    I encourage readers to read information for themselves and make informed decisions at bugwu.org—we began bargaining so late *only because* the university delayed for months, and we have voted to strike only after exhausting all other options. If the graduate union accepted BU’s current wage offer, I would be taking an 8% pay cut—as I have been every year I’ve worked at BU.

    1. Thanks for your insight. That’s a lazy comment from someone who clearly has no understanding of finance. The title of EBITDA refers to cash flow. An endowment is a pool of assets, and the university is required to use a certain percentage of it each year. Not sure why the future should be mortgaged to increase payment for part-time workers who are already getting a free education. The dollars have to come from somewhere, and BU being as expensive as it is suggests that there’s not much room for tuition increases. You’d end up devaluing your own degree if the university has to cut back in other areas to satisfy these absurd demands.

  3. You’d think a lifelong journalist would know that unbiased journalism requires engaging with both sides. Or maybe he only interviewed BU administrators on purpose.

    1. Zoe, thanks for your comment. In fact, I did reach out to the union twice, and several students, and got no replies. I understand that’s their right, certainly. The union president said he would call me back and did not. So instead I quoted from the letter that he sent. But attempts were made. — Doug Most

  4. last year, one of the STEM professors gave a lecture about “do grad students deserve to get paid”? There is a a food bank for grad students in that department because so many of them cant afford food. What a slap in the face

  5. This article has framed the negotiations very differently than they have actually occurred. Many grad students are only paid on 9 month stipends, despite needing to pay rent & eat all 12 months of the year. Let alone the fact that those of us on 12 month stipends are barely paid enough to cover rent (my rent increased by 12% this year- my stipend increased by 3%).

    Our contracts specifically prohibit us from accepting outside work or other employment. How do you expect us to survive?

    It shouldn’t be controversial for us to earn enough money to live, let alone to contribute to retirement savings while we perform crucial labor for the university in an increasingly precarious job market. The fact that our current proposal is “50% more than current BU stipends” says more about BU’s current stipends than it does about our proposal.

    BU has a $3 billion dollar endowment fund. I know 4 grad student colleagues who rely on food banks every week to feed themselves.

    Do better.

    1. With your free education?
      You already earn as much or more than other university staffers who don’t receive your other benefits. Until you’re in the real world, don’t cry about what you “deserve”.

      1. Acting as if PhD tuition remission is “free education” or an extreme benefit is misleading. That statement would sense if referring to an undergraduate, if they were to receive tuition remission. Universities and colleges have to convince prospective students to apply to and enroll in their PhD programs. This is considering that not many people pursue a doctoral degree and the applicant pool is much smaller. Whereas undergraduate students have to convince universities and colleges to let them attend their schools. It’s a much different institution/student relationship. Therefore, benefits like tuition remission are highly common because it convinces PhD students to attend and makes pursuing a doctoral degree possible.

        Also, this “free education” is not for the entire 5-8 years of a doctoral degree program. Most PhD students complete their coursework in 1-2 years, so for the rest of their degree they are enrolled as “continuing study” for no credits. The only substantial tuition remission is for the 1-2 year(s) that PhD students are actually doing coursework. The tuition remission benefit can only be pushed so far as a true benefit. Similarly, tuition remission is not a benefit that outweighs being paid a living wage.

        Funnily enough, all of us live in the real world. PhD students are adults… who provide for themselves… have the same responsibilities all other adults have… and are working too. There are PhD students in their 20s, 30s, 40s, 50s. We are not 18 year olds with no “real world” experience as you seem to think. Many of us have held careers before pursuing a PhD (and continue to hold those careers because we are not paid enough to live while working at BU). Many of us have children and families. Being a student is not the equivalent of being a child, sorry to break it to you. We have bills to pay, mouths to feed, second/third jobs to work. Hence, our real world experience informs our fight for what we deserve.

        It seems your disgruntled comments stem from your own mistreatment as an employee? Are you angry that you are witnessing others fighting for a pay that you wish you had? Maybe you should direct your anger at those who are actually unfairly compensating you for your work. Maybe its time to rethink: is it really a burden to your life that people are fighting for a living wage? Does graduate workers wanting to afford rent, groceries, childcare, etc. truly affect you?

  6. Harvard is paying their graduate students 50K, MIT is paying theirs a minimum of 47K, and UChicago just raised their minimum stipends to at least 45K (in a city with a much lower cost of living).

    If BU wants to market themselves as a prestigious research institution, they should pay their graduate students accordingly. Nearly all of the research and teaching that happens at BU could not be done without the work of graduate students, it’s time to treat them with the respect and pay they deserve.

  7. “Members are not required to participate in a strike, and it is unclear how many will actually take part.”

    Well, they voted by a 90% margin to authorize a strike, so I’d guess a fair number of them will actually take part.

  8. Saying that “the [stipend] figures represent part-time jobs at 20 hours a week” is so disingenuous. This implies that grad workers could reasonably expect to get another part-time job outside of BU to supplement their stipend income, but that is simply not the case. Not only is grad school a full-time commitment, but also many of us are strongly discouraged, or even explicitly forbidden, from taking outside jobs. To quote directly from my offer letter:

    “The purpose of fully supporting our graduate students is to allow them to engage wholly in their scholarly work and to devote the attention necessary to complete their studies in a timely fashion. . . . We also expect that you will not be employed outside of Boston University.”

    Based on this, I’m not supposed to take any outside jobs, but I shouldn’t need to because my stipend will “fully support” me while I work full-time towards my degree. So I’m supposed to be financially supported full-time but they’re only paying me a part-time stipend? The math isn’t mathing on that one.

    I am fortunate enough to have financial support from my family while I pursue my degree, but what happens for people who don’t have any outside support? They’re faced with a choice between trying to survive on a part-time stipend in one of the most expensive cities in the US or going against their contract to get an outside job (on top of their full-time grad school workload). And some grad workers don’t even get to make that choice (e.g., international grads with visa restrictions).

    The way this article presents our compensation proposal is trying to spin it to make us look greedy, but we’re not trying to get rich by asking for a living wage; we’re just trying to survive. Do better, BU!

  9. Def support folks looking to better their situation, I’d be interested in what this would look like for the recently announced post-doc minimum of 65k (at 40 hours/wk) or the high number of administrative staff working full time who also make much less than 62k. The rising tide doesn’t lift all boats, so someone is going to be disappointed in the end. Perhaps the L2324 folks should consider driving a harder bargain?

    1. Everybody is looking to better their situation, including all of us who pay tuition to BU. It doesn’t mean that unreasonable pay and benefits are deserved or earned.

    2. I will also be interested in seeing how the negotiations around pay specifically turn out. Especially considering that a large number of BU staff (if not the majority) are unhappy with their salaries; full-time employees with none of the benefits of a union to support them in these issues.

      I absolutely agree that BUGWU should be fighting for the best benefits/pay for its members, but I hope BU understands that staff are seeing this. Staff are watching post-doc minimums be raised, we are following the GWU negotiations (and final contracts), and we see how much our work is continuing to be devalued and underpaid.

      On top of that, we received this message from the presidents office regarding the strike:
      “…We depend on you to help us ensure the ongoing education of our students, especially our undergraduates… I have seen how our staff were able to sustain our operations during the pandemic by pivoting admirably with little advance notice. Your commitment to delivering high quality work under trying circumstances is extraordinary.”
      So, like in the pandemic, when perhaps more work will be required of staff, we are expected to shoulder any extra burdens without any extra compensation.

  10. I just Googled Which university pays most for PhD?
    Stanford University
    Stipends can help easy the journey of many PhD students, and here are the highest paying PhD stipends in the USA: Stanford: At Stanford University, PhD students are at the top, with a whopping $45,850 stipend, the highest PhD stipend, making it a dream for many.Jan 30, 2024.

    The article sounds fair to me and like BU is in line with its peers. I agree it is unfortunate how expensive everything is for everyone.

    1. Harvard’s stipend is 50K. Also, Stanford is not a peer institution. Most of the time Googling something doesn’t give you the right answer and it surely doesn’t contextualize BUGWU’s situation.

      “I agree it is unfortunate how expensive everything is for everyone.” Yes, and BU has more than enough money to change that. It doesn’t have to remain unfortunate if private institutions stop hoarding wealth. BU’s operating budget had a surplus of $152 million for FY 22-23. They have more than enough money to pay graduate workers a living wage.

    2. Hi Staffer—
      Most grad workers are not making anything close to 45k at BU. Many grad workers make 26k/year or 31k/ year. While BU’s offer raises the 12-month minimum to 42k, those of us on 8 or 9 month funding cycles would still be making only ~1-2k more per year (so, 28k for those on 8-month funding). This is less than half of the living wage in Boston! Even if BU was in line with peer institutions, you’re right to point to how expensive everything is—all workers at BU should be paid more. BU rakes in a 150mil+ surplus every year, they can certainly afford it!

    3. Assuming I’m looking at the same article you are, that was the stipend for the 2020/2021 academic year. On Stanford’s website it says the current doctoral pay (salary + any assistantships) is $51,600. Considering that other schools in the Boston area (Harvard and MIT) pay in the ballpark of $50k, BU’s current offer doesn’t even put them in line with others in the area.

    4. Hi staffer! This is inaccurate information as MIT and Harvard both have higher base wages. Also, a quick search into Stanfords website shows that their base stipend is higher than your reported number as well!

    5. I think a bit more research is in order. Harvard PhD students make at least $50k. MIT students make about $48,000. Some BU students are making $28,000ish before tax. Hope this helps. <3

  11. Our university, which touts itself as a prestigious antiracist institution, refuses to negotiate in good faith, despite having more than enough money to pay high-ranking administrators six figures. Meanwhile, the university plans to withhold payment to striking student workers (you know, the ones who need more $ to not struggle to live here) and expects staff to find ways to fill in for them (as if staff didn’t feel overworked as it is).

    Perhaps the most revered BU alum, MLK JR, attended the Memphis sanitation workers strike. Where is the same spirit of love? Where is the same call for human dignity? Perhaps faculty and staff might consider joining the strike as well.

    I find myself disappointed by the one-sided reporting of this article. There is an entire website on the progress of the negotiations that is run by the union that was not at all consulted. I’m glad that the comments brought a few important points to light.

    To all the striking students, I support you! An injury to you, is an injury to the entire university!

  12. First of all, pay your grad workers.
    Second, this article is riddled with basic inaccuracies about local labor. For example, it appears to reference a Tufts grad strike that literally never happened (source: I was on that bargaining committee, we did not go on strike), misunderstands why the Newton teacher’s strike was illegal (because it’s illegal for public employees to strike in MA, not because they were under a no strike clause), and incorrectly states that BU’s other unions are under a no strike clause (the Part Time Lecturers are operating under an expired contract and not bound by a no strike clause).

    Some friendly advice from across the river: stop putting your energy into sloppy PR releases that would get a B- at best from every TA I work with, and start putting your energy towards actually reaching a fair deal with your employees.

  13. This is saddening to read. It makes it sound like a part-time job asking for exorbitant pay. But, as another person posted above, when we entered the program we were promised that our stipend would fully support us so that we could focus solely on our academic work. WE ARE ALSO EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED FROM HOLDING ANY OTHER EMPLOYMENT. BU fully expects us to live off of a stipend that is demonstrably lower than the cost of living in Boston.

    Many of us live in the same neighborhoods, buildings, and even individual apartments with grad workers from Harvard or MIT who make a lot more than we do. IF BU WANTS TO CLAIM IT IS A PEER OF HARVARD AND MIT THEN IT NEEDS TO SUPPORT ITS PHD STUDENTS IN COMPARABLE WAYS.

    And don’t even think about if you have other circumstances come up… a few years ago I needed extensive dental work that cost over 50% of my stipend. I was lucky and family helped. But as a person in my mid-30s, my family cannot and will not always help me. I’m so glad that a dental insurance plan is part of the bargaining. But that won’t completely cover students who need more than a cleaning a year.

    I really wish this article had told the whole story about our situations and quoted some of us, other than one insta post.

  14. This whole strike concept is nonsensical. They’re lucky to be making anything while receiving a high quality education. Unfortunately the university is pandering to outrageous demands. More importantly, what is being done to ensure undergraduates continue receiving the education they paid for? Why are the contingency plans, other than telling professors that they’ll need to make plans? The university seems woefully unprepared to be held up by these TAs.

  15. As a staff union member, it has been heartening to see the grad students unionize and stand firm for what they deserve. I know the other BU unions are behind you all the way. Go BUGWU!

  16. Mr. Lutchen’s letter to parents about the looming strike we found cynical and demeaning toward a just cause and it prompted us to donate substantially to the graduate workers union. We had hoped to view indentured servitude as a thing of the past. Doesn’t it trouble the BU admin that it appears to consider past as prologue?

  17. I think this article could benefit from providing more context of the cost of living in Boston, expenses that the average PhD student could be expected to have (rent, groceries, gas, textbooks, parking, family expenses, MBTA pass, etc.). Once you provide that context, you realize that it is absolutely unreasonable to expect graduate students to survive off of these stipends. Those negotiating from the BU administrative side have no idea what it is to live off such low pay in Boston in 2024.

    Let’s get another article going examining the “day-in-the-life” of the graduate students who are going to strike, how much time they spend being the backbone of the university, how much money they spend, how much money they are paid, how much care they give to their students, how many late night hours they spend getting all this work done for BU. THEN let’s do the math. Would love a graphic showing a mock budget, salary, taxes, etc.

  18. My initial comment from 3/19/2024 for this article was not posted. It is unclear why as I said nothing offensive and demonstrated support for the graduate students. I did criticize the article for being lopsided in its reporting (many other commenters have pointed out the same). I brought up the fact the university presidents and the like are paid six figures, so a pay cut in order for students to be able to afford basic necessities should not be out of the question. I did question whether a strike by faculty and staff in solidarity with striking grad students might be worthwhile. I spoke about MLK’s involvement in the Memphis Sanitation Workers strike. I don’t believe I did anything wrong. As a longtime BU Today reader, I am disappointed that moderators decided to not allow my post to be published, despite being a frequent poster that attempts to keep things cordial.

    My primary message remains: An injury to grad students is an injury to the entire university! Raise their pay!

  19. I am one of the many BU professors/faculty who support the graduate student workers and the present efforts of their union. I’d like to address one theme of the university administration’s rhetoric as reported by BU Today above. The administration says that “…if graduate students are not available, faculty will need to create a plan to continue to teach lab or discussion sections…” The administration has also told us that grading of essays and assignment will need to be done by faculty or non-BU workers. BU departments have already been told that the administration would like us to draw up contingency plans and return such plans to the administration, and a number of departments (the number is unknown to me, but I am in one of them) have decided not to comply with this request. I hope the undergraduate students recognize that this is in no way demonstrates a failure on our part to value their continuing education. Undergraduate students and their families actually have a lot of power in this situation to influence the university administration. If faculty were to undermine a strike by BU graduate student workers by making sure that the presence of BU graduate student workers was not required for teaching purposes, this would be effectively undermining the strike (and any non-BU workers employed for this purpose would be crossing a picket line). Of course, every BU faculty member needs to make up their own mind whether to stand with the graduate student workers, or stand against them, but no one should fool themselves: *finding alternative ways to get grading done or have discussion classes taught, etc. necessarily involves pitting oneself against the graduate student union.*

  20. As a supporter of the striking students represented by the Boston University Graduate Workers Union (BUGWU), it’s crucial to address the concerns and demands raised by the union. The issues of pay, benefits, workload protections, and overall well-being are fundamental aspects of fair and equitable working conditions, especially for graduate students who play a vital role in the university’s functioning.

    Firstly, the argument that students should feel lucky to receive compensation while pursuing a high-quality education overlooks the fact that fair compensation is essential for graduate students to focus on their academic and research responsibilities effectively. The demands for a living wage, workload protections, and stronger healthcare, childcare, and family leave benefits are not only reasonable but necessary for ensuring the dignity and stability of graduate workers.

    The offers presented by BU officials, while they may represent some progress, do not fully address the core concerns of the union members. The increase in stipends and other benefits is a step in the right direction, but it falls short of meeting the demands for fair compensation and comprehensive support in an area that, to quote from Apartments.com, “As of March 2024, the average rent in Boston, MA is $3,327 per month. This is 122% higher than the national average rent price of $1,498/month, making Boston one of the most expensive cities in the US. “.

    Moreover, the assertion that a disruption to students’ lectures, seminars, discussions, and labs is unacceptable overlooks the fact that such disruptions are often necessary to draw attention to crucial issues and bring about meaningful change. It’s essential to recognize the agency and rights of graduate workers to advocate for their rights and working conditions without facing undue pressure or restrictions.

    Supporting the striking students means acknowledging and addressing their legitimate concerns, advocating for fair and equitable treatment, and fostering a collaborative approach to finding mutually beneficial solutions that uphold the values of dignity, respect, and fairness for all members of the university community.

  21. In response to the article about the potential strike of Boston University Graduate Workers Union (BUGWU), it’s crucial to recognize the inherent power dynamics and structural inequalities at play. The BUGWU, representing over 3,000 graduate students, is rightfully advocating for fair pay, workload protections, and improved benefits. This is not merely about individual compensation but about addressing systemic issues that impact the well-being and dignity of workers who contribute significantly to the university’s functioning.

    The offers presented by BU officials, while seemingly addressing some concerns, fall short of meeting the fundamental needs of graduate workers. The proposals must be evaluated not just in isolation but in comparison to industry standards and the rising cost of living, especially in cities like Boston. The demands for a living wage, workload protections, and stronger benefits are not unreasonable; they are essential for ensuring that workers can lead dignified lives without financial instability.

    The solidarity expressed by the union and graduate students through social media platforms like Instagram reflects a collective understanding of the broader socioeconomic context. It’s not just about financial compensation but about creating an environment where workers can thrive both academically and personally. The willingness to take action through a strike demonstrates a commitment to advocating for justice and fairness in labor relations, principles that resonate deeply with social justice movements that I have long championed.

    Ultimately, the negotiations should prioritize addressing the core concerns raised by BUGWU in a meaningful and substantive way. This includes acknowledging the value of graduate workers’ contributions, ensuring fair compensation and benefits, and fostering an environment of mutual respect and collaboration. It’s not merely about reaching an agreement but about building a more equitable and inclusive university community where all members can flourish.

  22. In the dialectical dance of power and resistance, the recent developments at Boston University reveal the inherent contradictions of our socio-economic order. The Boston University Graduate Workers Union (BUGWU), embodying the aspirations and struggles of over 3,000 graduate students, stands at the crossroads of exploitation and emancipation. The specter of a strike looms large, reflecting the tension between labor and capital, between the demands for dignity and the pressures of profit.

    The rhetoric of university officials, with its appeals to empathy and care, masks the underlying power dynamics at play. The discourse of “good faith negotiations” and “reasonable offers” belies the structural inequalities that pervade academia. The commodification of education, where students are simultaneously workers and learners, lays bare the contradictions of a system that values productivity over well-being, profit over solidarity.

    The union’s demands for a living wage, workload protections, and enhanced benefits resonate with the broader struggles for social justice and human dignity. Their use of social media as a platform for dissent and solidarity underscores the power of collective action in challenging entrenched hierarchies, and so on. As Meiya Sparks Lin eloquently puts it, “This isn’t just about fair pay; it’s about ensuring that the workers who keep the university running can lead dignified lives without the constant worry of financial instability.”

    In this moment of confrontation, we are confronted with fundamental questions about the nature of education, labor, and power. The resolution of this conflict will not only shape the future of graduate workers at Boston University but also reverberate across the landscape of higher education, challenging us to rethink the values and priorities that govern our institutions.

  23. The tone and misrepresentation of facts in this article regarding the ongoing graduate student union negotiations is very disheartening to see. BU admin has done everything in their power to stall any meaningful negotiations over the past several months and have only started to propose counter offers, although still insufficient, since hearing about the plan to strike. As an individual student I have brought in $160k in funding from the National Science Foundation and National Institute of Health, $36K of which I never see and goes directly to BU as an institution. I know dozens of graduate students within my department, and hundred across BU, that have these same awards, totaling to MILLIONS of dollars. As a institution with a multi-BILLION dollar net worth, it is unbelievable that BU leadership is not willing to adequately compensate the labor of graduate students conducting cutting edge research that they profit off of. I would sincerely request that the author of this article include perspective of graduate students in a followup article because this current article is very one sided and entirely biased towards the goals of BU admin.

  24. In full support of a union for grad workers, as everyone should be paid a living wage. Also, if part time grad workers will be paid a living wage, then full time staff need to be as well. Insane to think about the amount of time most staff put into their jobs here at BU, how we often go above and beyond and work outside our 40 hours and many of us are not being paid a livable salary. For example, many full time staff (both hourly union and salaried non-union), including myself, make less than the $62k livable salary. Many of my peers commute well over an hour to work because many cannot afford to live in Boston or the surrounding area. And those of us, like myself, who choose to live in the Greater Boston area struggle through just like our grad students. If part time work will be compensated at a higher rate than full time work, the University should seriously consider their pay grades.

    1. This is exactly why BU doesn’t want to pay BUGWU living wages… because it means they will actually have to start paying all of their employees living wages. We all need to fight for what we deserve! Solidarity!

      1. This is spot on!

        Your point resonates deeply. Many talented staff members I know have chosen to leave due to compensation that falls short of the competitive market rate FOR higher ed, not just outside our industry. This, coupled with rising living costs in Boston, makes it increasingly difficult for staff to maintain a secure financial footing.

        In the past benefits such as tuition coverage/discounts, health care, stable wages made higher ed a great choice for many folks careers. However many of these benefits have been stripped year over year and other industries at this point have either caught up or exceeded the benefits our institutions can provide. At that point, all that’s left is to compare wages which at this point reflect entry level salaries of a decade ago, leaving many people I know having to pick up secondary jobs or side hustles just to make ends meet.

  25. Many non-TT faculty have taken a “no scab” pledge to not cover struck work, and I encourage any other instructor who has not already done so to sign it here: https://act.seiu.org/a/no-struck-work

    We stand in solidarity with the grad workers and hope that their brave strike can help push BU Admin to offer fair wages to all of its instructors (grad, adjunct, lecturer, tenured), plenty of whom are still woefully underpaid.

    And allow me to add that the misrepresentations in this article represents a new low for BU Today: pure ventriloquism for the administration.

  26. I’m a little late to the game with this comment, but I think this is an important point to clarify, so I think it’s worth posting this explanation in case anyone is still reading.

    Calling grad workers “part-time” is misleading. As a PhD student in a STEM department, we are technically paid for 20 hours of teaching work or research duties per week, but we are working 40+ hours per week, and our supervisors expect us to do that. Here is a quote from this article:
    “The students in the BU bargaining unit, which includes teaching assistants and teaching fellows, are paid for up to 20 hours of work per week. As students who are also fulfilling course requirements and doing dissertation research, they spend additional time.”
    This “additional time” that grad workers spend is often in excess of an additional 20 hours per week, totaling 40+ hours per week of work. Those additional 20 hours aren’t just spent taking classes and doing homework. (In many departments, we are expected to finish our coursework requirements within our first few years, so we’re not just spending all 5 years taking classes for free and teaching “part time!”) During those additional hours, we are doing research, writing grant proposals, mentoring undergraduates, doing fieldwork, doing outreach, doing managerial tasks for our labs, connecting with collaborators at institutions outside of BU, sharing our work at conferences, etc. The work that we are doing directly benefits the university by producing top-tier research, forging collaborations and extending the professional network of current BU researchers, publishing and presenting our research to others in our field, and continuing to work with undergraduates to ensure that they get hands-on experience outside of the classroom to encourage their future success. Some of these duties that we spend “additional time” on are within our job description, namely the dissertation work and fulfillment of course requirements. Some of these duties truly are not within the scope of our responsibilities, including continued one-on-one mentorship with undergrads outside of our teaching duties, managerial tasks in our labs, extensive outreach, and some grant-writing activities. However, I want to emphasize again that we are expected to perform all of these tasks– it’s not a choice. All of this is labor, but on paper, we are “are paid for up to 20 hours of work per week.”

    I know this explanation was a bit long, but I hope that it helps to illustrate that we do work 40+ hours per week, even though the university claims that we work 20 hours per week.

    For a little bit more context, the compensation that we are asking for is not out of line. Other commenters have made points about the level of teaching that we do, the cost of living in Boston, and the stipends at our peer institutions, which are all great points. I also wanted to add that the median salary for an entry-level position in my STEM discipline in Massachusetts is ~$83k right now. With my bachelor’s degree that I already have, I could go and earn that right now, and so can the undergrads that I teach and mentor and send off into the world. However, BU pays me less than half of that amount to do work that is above and beyond what would be required of me at a job like that. I am not speaking hypothetically, as I worked in government research before I came to BU for a PhD. Back then, I was straight out of undergrad and making double what BU pays me now, and the work that I was doing was at a much lower level than what I am doing now. I also had much better benefits, was compensated for overtime work, and was not required to do work outside of my job description or outside of normal work hours.
    I also agree with other commenters that BU should pay all of its employees more. Median salaries for administrative workers in Massachusetts look like they are $60k or more based on a quick Google search. Lecturers should be paid more as well, as they are responsible for designing and teaching many of the core classes at BU. People who are overworked, underpaid, and undervalued are not going to be able to perform at their best. If we were not struggling to make ends meet, we would all be able to provide a better educational experience to undergraduate students and to our whole community.

    We are not just students. We are workers and professionals in our fields, and we provide top-tier education to the BU community while doing cutting-edge research. We KNOW the value of this work, and we are asking BU to recognize that as well.

  27. Hey, hot take: Workers should be able to live without being rent-burdened. Apparently, an even hotter take is that maybe a *chance* at $600 for a grad worker’s childcare (not even per child! Per family!) when grad workers have kids is ghoulish. BU can pay up!

  28. The news media is reporting that 3,000 graduate students are on strike. Roughly 90% that voted to authorize the strike would approximate 2,700. There were nowhere near 2,700 participants in the noontime strike rally today. Where was everybody who supposedly voted to go on strike? Seems like it was mostly humanities and social scientists anyways. Where were the Engineers, Computer Scientists, Biophysiochemists, and Mathematicians? What about the geologists and oceanographers? What about the future doctors and dentists? Maybe future rallys and pickets should position themselves outside the buildings where these students hang out.

    1. The stat does not mean 90% of all 3,000+ grad workers voted to strike. Instead, 90% of the people who voted in the SAV, voted to strike. I’m not sure if the specific number of people who voted in the SAV was publicized by BUGWU. Even so, its near impossible to expect all 3,000, or even 2,700, grad workers to physically show up in-person to express the strike beginning or join in the rally. Many of us hold jobs outside of BU and not everyone can commute to campus everyday of the week to picket. Picketing is a strike activity, but the strike is most of all about disruption and withholding our work. I agree that the turnout could be stronger, but the reality of everyones day-to-day situations puts that into perspective. Nonetheless, there are plenty of other grad workers are at BU medical campus…so that’s where you will find your other future doctors.

Post a comment.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *