• Doug Most

    Associate Vice President, Executive Editor, Editorial Department Twitter Profile

    Doug Most is a lifelong journalist and author whose career has spanned newspapers and magazines up and down the East Coast, with stops in Washington, D.C., South Carolina, New Jersey, and Boston. He was named Journalist of the Year while at The Record in Bergen County, N.J., for his coverage of a tragic story about two teens charged with killing their newborn. After a stint at Boston Magazine, he worked for more than a decade at the Boston Globe in various roles, including magazine editor and deputy managing editor/special projects. His 2014 nonfiction book, The Race Underground, tells the story of the birth of subways in America and was made into a PBS/American Experience documentary. He has a BA in political communication from George Washington University. Profile

  • John O’Rourke

    Editor, BU Today

    John O'Rourke

    John O’Rourke began his career as a reporter at The MacNeil/Lehrer NewsHour. He has worked as a producer at World Monitor, a coproduction of the Christian Science Monitor and the Discovery Channel, and NBC News, where he was a producer for several shows, including Now with Tom Brokaw and Katie CouricNBC Nightly News, and The Today Show. John has won many awards, including four Emmys, a George Foster Peabody Award, and five Edward R. Murrow Awards. Profile

  • Sophie Yarin

    Associate Editor, BU Today; Managing Editor Bostonia

    Photo: Headshot of Sophie Yarin. A white woman with wavy brown hair and wearing a black dress and gold necklace, smiles and poses in front of a dark grey backdrop.

    Sophie Yarin is a BU Today associate editor and Bostonia managing editor. She graduated from Emerson College's journalism program and has experience in digital and print publications as a hybrid writer/editor. A lifelong fan of local art and music, she's constantly on the hunt for stories that shine light on Boston's unique creative communities. She lives in Jamaica Plain with her partner and their cats, Ringo and Xerxes, but she’s usually out getting iced coffee. Profile

  • Janice Checchio

    Associate Creative Director, Photography

    Photo of Janice Checchio, a white woman with short blonde hair and reddish glasses who wears a leopard print shirt.

    Janice Checchio has been an art director, editorial designer, photo editor, photographer, or some combination of the aforementioned for 12 years. After seven years at The Boston Phoenix and Stuff Boston Magazine, she returned to direct photography at Boston University, where she had received a BFA in Graphic Design. She lives a photo–ready life in Dorchester with her husband, son, and way too many pairs of glasses. Profile

Comments & Discussion

Boston University moderates comments to facilitate an informed, substantive, civil conversation. Abusive, profane, self-promotional, misleading, incoherent or off-topic comments will be rejected. Moderators are staffed during regular business hours (EST) and can only accept comments written in English. Statistics or facts must include a citation or a link to the citation.

There are 5 comments on BU RAs Begin Strike as Move-In Winds Down

  1. This article is very insincere. It lists compensation as an issue forgetting to mention that RAs are restricted from getting outside jobs. What use is a kitchen if you have no money for food?

    It fails to mention one of the things RA’s are fighting for is medical leave. I imagine if god forbid any administer were to be hospitalized for an unforeseen medical emergency they why have peace of mind in the fact they won’t be fired for it or punished because of it. The fact that they are fighting so hard to ensure not all of their employees have the same peace of mind is outrageous.

    1. Well, concerned mother, what would you suggest they do? Will you provide housing for them in the meantime? In fact, this is unironically a great idea: members of the community at large should consider sponsoring a striking student. At the very least, donating to a strike fund will help.

  2. The striking members of Boston University’s Residence Life Union are not just a group of disgruntled student workers; they are the living, breathing contradictions of the capitalist university system. The university, which markets itself as a community-oriented institution dedicated to the holistic development of its students, is in reality a corporation beholden to the bottom line of tuition revenue. This contradiction is laid bare by the very nature of the strike. On one hand, the university touts its “world-class experience” and “sense of belonging” as integral to the student experience. On the other, it treats the workers responsible for cultivating that experience—those who are literally living with and among the student body—as disposable labor.

    The university administration’s response, with its polite acknowledgment of the union’s right to strike, reads like a PR exercise designed to maintain the appearance of concern while ensuring the machinery of the institution continues to operate smoothly. The strike, we are told, has not disrupted the carefully choreographed dance of Move-in Weekend, and the university remains committed to providing “an exceptional living experience.” But this framing conveniently obscures the power dynamics at play, reducing the strike to a mere inconvenience rather than a legitimate challenge to the exploitation of student labor.

    The RAs, GRAs, and GHAs are demanding fair wages, reasonable workloads, and basic safety protections—things that, in a just society, would not need to be fought for in the first place. Yet, in the capitalist structure of higher education, even these modest demands are met with resistance. The university’s offer—a stipend, meal plans, and some training—is presented as a generous concession. But the truth is that these are the bare minimum for the essential work these students do, work that the university cannot function without.

    Moreover, the strike occurs against the backdrop of Boston being one of the most expensive cities for renters in the U.S. The cost of living in Boston, as highlighted in recent reports, makes the already precarious financial situation of student workers even more untenable. The university’s offer does little to address the real economic pressures these students face, pressures that are only exacerbated by the high cost of housing, food, and other basic necessities in a city like Boston.

    The university’s stance is not surprising. The administration’s primary concern is to maintain the institution’s profitability, and the exploitation of student labor is a key part of that equation. The RAs are expected to perform labor under the guise of educational enrichment, but in reality, they are a cheap labor force that allows the university to cut costs while still maintaining the veneer of community and support. The strike is not just about wages and benefits; it is a challenge to the very system that treats education as a commodity and students as consumers rather than as full human beings deserving of dignity and fair treatment.

    The university’s reluctance to meet the union’s demands reflects a broader unwillingness to disrupt the status quo. To do so would mean acknowledging that the current system is not just flawed, but fundamentally unjust. The administration’s focus on minimizing disruption and continuing business as usual is, in essence, an attempt to defuse the power of the strike by reframing it as a temporary blip rather than a legitimate exercise of collective power.

    In the end, the university’s response is a testament to the power of ideology. By presenting itself as a benevolent institution committed to student welfare, it masks the reality of its role as a capitalist enterprise. The students on strike are not just fighting for better wages or safer working conditions; they are challenging the very foundations of a system that prioritizes profit over people. And in doing so, they are reminding us all that the fight for justice is never simply about the immediate demands, but about the larger struggle for a society in which human dignity is not a privilege, but a right.

Post a comment.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *