• Rich Barlow

    Senior Writer

    Photo: Headshot of Rich Barlow, an older white man with dark grey hair and wearing a grey shirt and grey-blue blazer, smiles and poses in front of a dark grey backdrop.

    Rich Barlow is a senior writer at BU Today and Bostonia magazine. Perhaps the only native of Trenton, N.J., who will volunteer his birthplace without police interrogation, he graduated from Dartmouth College, spent 20 years as a small-town newspaper reporter, and is a former Boston Globe religion columnist, book reviewer, and occasional op-ed contributor. Profile

  • Janice Checchio

    Associate Creative Director, Photography

    Photo of Janice Checchio, a white woman with short blonde hair and reddish glasses who wears a leopard print shirt.

    Janice Checchio has been an art director, editorial designer, photo editor, photographer, or some combination of the aforementioned for 12 years. After seven years at The Boston Phoenix and Stuff Boston Magazine, she returned to direct photography at Boston University, where she had received a BFA in Graphic Design. She lives a photo–ready life in Dorchester with her husband, son, and way too many pairs of glasses. Profile

Comments & Discussion

Boston University moderates comments to facilitate an informed, substantive, civil conversation. Abusive, profane, self-promotional, misleading, incoherent or off-topic comments will be rejected. Moderators are staffed during regular business hours (EST) and can only accept comments written in English. Statistics or facts must include a citation or a link to the citation.

There are 36 comments on BU to Suspend Free Room and Meals for Striking Student RAs

    1. PR is secondary to fairness. Not fair to the tens of thousands of paying students that subsidize the RAs to show that it’s okay to decide when you will and won’t work and still get paid.

  1. The RAs are probably the single most diverse group of students on BUs campus. These are often students coming from backgrounds where free housing is essential and since BU refuses to pay them at all currently (the $1000 offer is way lower than what RAs in almost all schools across the US and especially around Boston), many of them are forced to take up a second and a third job just to pay for food and survive.

    Retaliating RAs in this way for exercising their legal right to strike after stalling at the bargaining table for over a year is just heartless and ghoulish behavior. The university is literally threatening to deny housing and food to hundreds of the most vulnerable students here

    BU dares to charge undergrad 60k+ in tuition and another 20 – 30k for housing, and somehow they cannot find the courage to negotiate with RAs in good faith and offer them a fair contract.

    1. If free housing was essential for these students then it would be provided through some sort of financial assitance. As an RA, I can confidently say that the vast majority of us are middle class, meaning that we do not qualify for free housing, and while it would cause some financial strain to pay for housing, it is in no case “essential”.

      In unions, when employees go on strike, they stop receiving a paycheck. Because our compensation is free housing, it is only fair they are making us pay daily for housing the days we are on strike.

      BU has not stalled at the bargaining table, if anything SEIU has done a poor job at bargaining on RAs’ behalf. SEIU tends to extend the meetings due to poor preparation and misinformation from their own staff. SEIU is partially responsible for the absolute mess of a strike that is currently happening.

      BU has made great offers for quite a few of our articles, such as $1000 compensation, a meal plan, and free CPR and narcan training for all RAs. Many RAs would be willing to accept these articles and abandon the rest, but the few leaders representing the union as well as SEIU has shot this down without taking into consideration what the majority of RAs want.

      Make sure to do some research and read this article thoroughly before leaving an ignorant comment. BU is not “literally threatening to deny housing and food to hundreds of the most vulnerable students”. Like I stated earlier, we are not the most vulnerable. Secondly, they are not denying us housing and food (if you had read the article you would know that). BU is allowing striking RAs to continue to reside in their dorms and have access to their meal plans. The only difference is after today, the RAs continuing to strike will be charged daily for housing and meal plans for the days they are not working.

      1. You & your surrounding RA colleagues may not be the most vulnerable, but there are absolutely RAs that are vulnerable due to being from low-income backgrounds. As a former RA (2016-2020) it is extremely disappointing to hear this move from BU administration. As a low-income student, I had to work 20-40 hours per week throughout my junior & senior year in order to afford to live in Boston. I come from a family where financial support from my parents was not possible. Rather than thinking about yourself and other middle class RAs, I encourage you to think about how this action is affecting the MOST vulnerable RAs on campus. It is not true that BU provides housing for all low-income students. Keep in mind that need-based financial aid is only available for US citizens. There are international students and US students on DACA that are not offered aid. I stand in solidarity with the strikers and I encourage anyone reading this article to think again about how this action affects low-income students, because they do exist at BU.

  2. Alumni

    Historically the management of dorms, meal and dunning services and fostering a strong RA program has been weak.

    Student RAs do not need to be taught about labor relationships but rather need to be treated fairly.

  3. A very patronizing and punitive view of student workers, assuming because they are young and at that the start of their careers, that they do not understand how labor relations and striking works. $1,000, and $2,300, are barely livable stipends in Boston – if university officials were in tune with the cost of living – and the union has fair demands. Instead of listening to them and coming to a reasonable agreement in earnest, the university decides to punish students and act like they’re (strikers) clueless as to what they’re doing. I hear the RAs and graduate students talking clearly about the strike everyday, and one thing is clear: they are frustrated.

    1. “$1,000, and $2,300, are barely livable stipends in Boston…”

      Okay, but the RAs aren’t subject to the biggest living expenses in Boston, which are rent, utilities, and food, especially now that every RA can receive a meal plan regardless of dorm or apartment-style placements.

      Everyone acting like the university has these mysterious deep pockets and infinite resources fails to note BU is a tuition-dependent university. Without students paying for tuition, especially those int’l students who pay the full sticker price, the university becomes insolvent. We’re not an Ivy League school with enough endowment interest to cover everybody’s expenses. Over 50% of the university’s annual revenue comes from tuition, in fact:

      https://www.bu.edu/cfo/files/2023/09/Boston-University-Audited-Financial-Statements-6-30-23-9.14.23.pdf

      I’ll leave that there for anyone with an actual interest in understanding the university’s financial profile.

  4. As a previous RA and GRA, I think it’s important to note that while BU says that housing is compensation for the role, it is more of a PERK than compensation. On-Campus housing is a necessary tool required to complete the job. You wouldn’t give a builder tools to build a house and say it was part of their compensation, would you? BU requires RAs and GRAs to live in the residential community and to be a presence in resident’s lives as they go through school. This doesn’t always leave time for other jobs or roles to pay for necessities, especially since the role is considered our ‘highest non-academic priority’. I think what BU needs to recognize is that housing is a necessary tool for the role and RAs/GRAs still need to be offered fair and livable compensation for the work they do for the community, even if they are still student workers who are ‘not accustomed to formalized labor relations’.

    It is my belief that BU and the Reslife Union have the opportunity to set a new standard for student workers everywhere. Our position in the academic world places a spot light on us, and whatever the outcome is could be implemented at many other academic institutions. This standard should be one of fair and equitable compensation for essential jobs, and should not be taken lightly.

    1. “You wouldn’t give a builder tools to build a house and say it was part of their compensation, would you?”

      Skilled laborers such as builders, mechanics, electricians, etc., do, in fact, have to supply their own tools. So, yes, if a company supplied those tools, it would likely come as material compensation.

  5. The entire article and interview is biased, condescending, and disingenuous, just as reporting on the BUGWU strike has been. “Working for room and board” is reminiscent of Depression-era exploitation and $500 to $1000 per semester (year?) is absolutely abysmal. This article also fails to mention that RAs are forbidden from having outside jobs and are also fighting for medical leave, which shouldn’t even be a question. But then again, BU Today had always been deep in the pockets of admin. Cowardly.

    1. RAs are not “forbidden” from having an outside job. It is a suggestion, as our academics are supposed to be our first priority with our RA gig to come second. And why do we need medical leave…. The way our jobs work we are (on average) working about once a week. If an RA were to speak to ResLife staff to request an entire MONTH off due to medical reasons that request would most definitely be approved.

      The current offer from BU is $1000 for RAs and $1500 for GRAs as well as a meal plan. With housing and food covered, what exactly are the remaining living costs? Do we want them to start paying for our $30 covers and a beer at the club? It’s ridiculous.

      Love the comparison to the Depression era. In no way are we under those same circumstances, we are attending a private university for goodness sake.

      1. Please keep in mind that international students CANNOT work another job because the RA role is 20 hours/week. International students cannot work more than 20 hours/week.

  6. $4500 stipend per semester?! On top of free housing and a meal plan? That’s more than most students’ work-study awards who don’t receive room and board as part of their jobs! Sorry striking RAs, that’s just delusional.

    1. Delusional in what way? Work-study and RA work is different, and perhaps that’s why compensation is also different. That being said, maybe work-study awards should be raised too. It shouldn’t be missed that the point here is that affordability of education is tenable. Even from the university’s standpoint that is necessary–no students to learn means no students paying tuition.

      1. In any student’s work study award, 70 percent of the funding comes from the federal government. The other 30 percent comes from the hiring department at the university. Raising work-study awards would involve government intervention. My point is that RAs asking for $4500/semester ($9k/year), when the value of their compensation already resides somewhere in the $11k – $20k range, is delusional when compared to what other student employees are earning from a federal program that benefits students nationwide.

        If I were a current student, I would be banging at the door to get a job that provides me housing, meals and a modest cash stipend for spending money. If the RA compensation package doesn’t satisfy a student’s needs, then perhaps they shouldn’t apply. It’s not like the job requirements and corresponding compensation are secret.

        1. The comment fundamentally misreads the situation, conflating work-study—a federal aid program—with RA compensation, which represents a labor relationship where RAs perform essential services like crisis management, support, and community building. To compare this labor to federal work-study is absurd; RAs deserve fair compensation for distinct, critical roles. Furthermore, dismissing demands for higher stipends ignores Boston’s brutal cost of living and the precarious nature of in-kind benefits like housing. The “don’t apply if you don’t like it” stance is pure ideology, masking the coercive economic pressures on students who need these positions to survive. Collective bargaining, far from “delusional,” is the exact mechanism through which such exploitation is challenged—yet this comment denies that right, revealing its failure to understand that the very essence of labor struggle is to question the so-called “fairness” of existing conditions. In short, what is truly delusional is the belief that merely offering a position absolves the employer of ensuring a just wage.

          1. Higher wages come from a source, though. What employee at the university wouldn’t want a higher wage, whether they’re RAs, faculty, or staff? If you want to give RAs a raise, then you must feel comfortable with tuition increasing beyond the already shocking $66,670 price? Pretending like BU is not tuition-dependent and it can just find new money is also disingenuous and divorced from reality (not directing this at you, Mr. Ornament). We’re not Harvard.

            I do agree with everyone who states that the cost of living in Boston is exorbitant. It is and I battle this, too.

  7. The fact that the BU admin have the audacity to say this is in the name of “fairness” when they are not compensating their workers fairly is absolutely mind-blowing. What do these highly-paid admin have to gain from putting down people who are disadvantaged? Do they think this makes them look better in some twisted way? Because it just makes BU look evil, and the BU community does not stand with the way admin has been treating their striking workers, who are pushed to this point because of NEED.

  8. I am writing to express my profound disappointment and concern over the recent actions taken by Boston University regarding the striking Residence Assistants (RAs). The university’s decision to charge RAs for their room and board during the strike is not only unjust but also undermines the essential support these dedicated individuals provide to our campus community.

    The RAs are the backbone of the residence life system. They are students who take on significant responsibilities, from managing conflicts and crises to creating a supportive and inclusive environment for their peers. Their work is crucial, and they perform these duties with remarkable commitment and professionalism. It is disheartening and unfair to see them penalized in such a manner during a time when they are standing up for their rights and better working conditions.

    Charging RAs for their room and board while they are on strike is not just a matter of financial inconvenience; it is an outright disregard for their hard work and the vital role they play. The university’s approach to withhold these essential benefits is not only punitive but also deeply counterproductive. It fails to acknowledge the sacrifices the RAs are making and does nothing to address the underlying issues that led to the strike in the first place.

    The university’s stance, framed as a matter of fairness, seems to ignore the broader context of these negotiations. By imposing additional financial strain on the RAs, the university is exacerbating an already challenging situation. This action not only undermines the RAs’ ability to advocate for fair and equitable conditions but also sends a troubling message about the value of their contributions.

    It is crucial for the university to reconsider its approach and engage in negotiations with a genuine commitment to addressing the RAs’ concerns. The RAs deserve to be treated with the respect and fairness that their roles warrant. Rather than penalizing them, the university should be working collaboratively to reach a resolution that acknowledges their importance and supports their needs.

    I urge the university to rectify this situation immediately and demonstrate a renewed commitment to fairness and respect for all members of our campus community.

    1. “The university’s decision to charge RAs for their room and board during the strike is not only unjust but also undermines the essential support these dedicated individuals provide to our campus community.” Yes, they perform vital services WHEN THEY ARE WORKING. However, when they are not working (for whatever reason) they cannot be compensated. In this case, some are not working, most are working. How does BU explain to the RAs who choose to work that those who don’t are getting the same compensation they are getting? When the RAs opted to unionize, they opted to negotiate in the real world, like any other union/management situation in any other industry. What industry continues to pay workers who go out on strike? I am a strong supporter of unions and worker rights. And BU is acting appropriately in paying only those who work. To do otherwise would be unfair to workers who exercise their right to work during the strike.

    2. But they aren’t doing the work while they are on strike!!! I agree the RAs provide essential support and work but while they walk picket lines they are not working. Thus, they are jot getting paid. This seems like common sense.

  9. One cannot expect to continue to get compensated during the work stoppage. Welcome to the real world and it is an appropriate and expected stance by BU. I work incredibly hard to burden the cost of paying for BU and so the administration needs to think of stewardship. The housing is so very expensive.

  10. The fact that only 25% of the RA population is participating in the strike is telling. Second, (as a former RA), generally, you received free room and board and free meals. That’s it! It would be great to compare what BU is offering compared to other schools in Boston, namely NU, BC, Harvard, MIT. Should be a good opportunity to establish how far off (or not) BU is in compensating their RA’s. These schools operate in the same market.

  11. See the issue here is that the people who often become RAs usually are already under financial hardship and need to RA in order to afford school. I don’t understand how you can claim that you don’t need to meet what they are asking if they are the ones who are in a tough financial situation that requires them to RA in order to get their education. It honestly feels really out of touch, working for room and board just doesn’t make sense anymore with this world today. One commenter already made a great analogy to construction workers, where you wouldn’t say the tools a worker uses is compensation for their job, and I second that. Also, $1000 is barely anything anymore, and I don’t understand how admin can act like that is a fair wage. Admin seems super out of touch here when the general public’s opinion feels much more aligned with RAs and grad students. Get your stuff together BU.

  12. These students may be future leaders of companies down the road and this is unfortunate training for how to treat workers. It seems an inadvertent lesson in all this is to exploit your most vulnerable employees for as much as possible and grudgingly make concessions that may not respect human dignity.

  13. As a current RA I support this. I did not go on strike and the strike was pointless and did more damage than helped. It’s not fair that I did work these people didn’t and weren’t charged. I think this union is one of the worst things that has ever happened and I absolutely hate it. I don’t trust a word SEIU says, or my GRA who was pressuring me to strike. I’m glad I joined the call yesterday to experience how incredibly bad our representation is and the damage they’ve done to personal relationships and I hope we get to opt out.

    1. Do you believe the amount of work you’ve done is because of the people who were on strike? Welcome to being an RA. That would be your daily life as an RA. Also if you were in a bargaining session, you would know how BU is ….

  14. A really disappointing move from BU, and an even more frustrating article here.

    For context, the “hearty thanks” we got at training was about ten minutes of a soapbox about the power of community and student leadership and a weird anecdote about his son’s summer camp experience, followed immediately by the entire RA population sitting for a full hour waiting for admin to organize themselves enough to start the next session. In general, training feels more like middle school spirit week, complete with a field day and arts and crafts. We aren’t trained in CPR or any sort of triaging first aid. We aren’t taught signs of alcohol poisoning. We’re barely told how to contact the resources presented to us. We are instead fed redundant corporate nonsense and made to understand that we are drones for admin, only trusted with enough information to report back to the actual professionals despite the sometimes horrifying things we encounter.

    To sit through that, attempt to make a statement about it, and instead be charged for the independence and leadership BU is trying to train us in is deeply demeaning and beyond frustrating. BU does not care about its workers or its students. Admin doesn’t think about the good of its students and staff- they think about the good of the institution, and especially the good of BU’s 3 billion+ endowment. Don’t even get me started on their “good faith” bargaining and the multiple sessions scheduled during popular class times or the sessions during the study period.

    There’s a definite dominant narrative at play here. If you really want to know how this is impacting RAs, talk to actual RAs. If you’re interested in why RAs are striking, talk to RAs. Not just the Union reps, even though BU Today didn’t even do us the dignity of reaching out to them. And definitely not just the Dean of Students, who I guarantee has no idea what actually goes on during our shifts. The overt bias in this article is really telling, and I’ll be thinking a lot less of BU Today from now on.

  15. Here’s a thought. BU should agree to all the union’s requests but make it clear every current RA will have to reapply for their position next semester. How will current RAs like competing with a massive new pool of applicants who also want in on one of the juiciest compensation packages available?

  16. What kind of story on a strike only prints management’s side? It signals that BU Today is a mouthpiece of the administration and not an independent journalistic enterprise that represents the perspectives of the entire BU community.

  17. Alumni and former RA for 3 years here.

    Like someone else mentioned, housing is not compensation, it is a requirement of the job to reside in a BU residence. It is your living space but it is also your office/work space. If a job required you to be in-person, would you expect their cost of renting an office building to come out of your paycheck?

    Straight from the Residence Life MOU, “Over the course of the academic year, the position averages 20 hours a week.” So it’s a part-time job. Weekday on-call shifts are 5pm to 9am, a 15 hour shift. Weekend on-call shifts are 9am to 9 am, a 24 hour shift. With Massachusetts minimum wage at $15/hr, the average of 20 hours a week works out to $300 a week. With 16 weeks in a semester, that works out to compensation of $4,800 a semester. And that doesn’t include training which is a week of 12 hr days for RA’s and 2 weeks of that for GRA’s. Not to mention the compensation lost from your 2nd or 3rd part time jobs that you can’t work those weeks.

    As an RA with “compensated housing”, I still had $27K in tuition to cover each semester.

    For those saying these students are “delusional”, they’re not. Many are just trying to survive week to week. The university withholding housing stipends is maybe fair but still egregious.

    To the university, please do show your true colors. Let prospective students see how you conduct business and how you value your students.

    To G/R/HA’s, hang in there. Most of you may be gone and graduated by the time the benefits of this contract are reaped, but keep fighting for future RA’s, who want to be able to devote their time to their residents and perform to the best of their ability.

    1. Also want to highlight in paragraph 2, “ Compensation for resident assistants, or RAs, includes free housing, valued at about $11,000 to $20,000 at BU.” If you’re gonna call housing compensation, why are some RA’s being compensated more/less than others? Talk about unfair.

Post a comment.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *